Protention and Predictive Processing: The Wave of the Future
Dan Lloyd
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Open peer commentary on the article “The Past, Present and Future of Time-Consciousness: From Husserl to Varela and Beyond” by Shaun Gallagher. Upshot: Gallagher’s main claim can be enhanced neurophenomenologically. In his 1907 lectures Thing and Space, Husserl argued that perception in general is enactive. Moreover, the neuroscientific theory of predictive processing connects neatly to a future-oriented phenomenology.
Citation
Lloyd D. (2017) Protention and predictive processing: The wave of the future. Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 98–99. http://constructivist.info/13/1/098
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
References
Friston K. (2005) A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 360(1456): 815–836.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gallagher S. & Zahavi D. (2014) Primal impression and enactive perception. In: Arstila V. & Lloyd D. (eds.) Subjective time: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of temporality. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 83–100.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hohwy J. (2012) Attention and conscious perception in the hypothesis testing brain. Frontiers in Psychology 3: 96.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Husserl E. (1997) Thing and space: Lectures of 1907. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz. Kluwer, Dordrecht. German original published in 1973.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1999) The specious present: The neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In: Petitot J., Varela F. J., Pachoud B. & Roy J. M. (eds.) Naturalizing phenomenology. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA: 266–314.
http://cepa.info/2081
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.
