Boundaries between and Variety within Approaches
Armin Scholl
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Open peer commentary on the article “Towards a Dialogue Among Constructivist Research Programs” by Gastón Becerra & José Antonio Castorina. Upshot: Similar to the target article I address the following questions: (1) How can constructivism be defined and distinguished from non-constructivist approaches? (2) How can different constructivist approaches be brought into a dialogue despite their variety? My answers to these questions will differ from those of the authors.
Citation
Scholl A. (2018) Boundaries between and variety within approaches. Constructivist Foundations 13(2): 206–208. http://constructivist.info/13/2/206
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
References
Adorno T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik E., Levinson D. J., Nevitt Sanford R. (1950) The authoritarian personality. Harper, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Alexander J. C., Giesen B., Münch R. & Smelser N. J. (eds.) (1987) The micro-macro link. University of California Press, Berkeley.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (1981) On cybernetics of cybernetics and social theory. In: Roth G. & Schwegler H. (eds.) Self-organizing systems. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt am Main: 102–105.
http://cepa.info/1670
Krüll M., Luhmann N. & Maturana H. R. (1989) Basic concepts of the theory of autopoietic systems: Nine questions to Niklas Luhmann and Humberto R. Maturana and their answers. In: Hargens J. (ed.) Systemic therapy: A European perspective (Systemic Studies Vol. 1) Borgmann, Broadstairs Kent UK: 79–104.
http://cepa.info/582
Schmidt S. J. (ed.) (1987) Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus [The discourse of radical constructivism]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.