Log in download the full text in PDF
Open peer commentary on the article “Towards a Dialogue Among Constructivist Research Programs” by Gastón Becerra & José Antonio Castorina. Upshot: Becerra and Castorina aim to consolidate lines of dialogue among the research programs of constructivism by elucidating the differences between them. In my commentary I question the efficacy of their methodological choice, wondering if marking differences and drawing dichotomous axes indeed establishes a good ground for dialogue to take place. I suggest that perhaps offering a broader conceptual container to hold the seemingly mutually excluding positions could be what is needed for a deeper communication between distinct lines of research to unfold.
Lenartowicz M. (2018) Constructivism in pains of self-analysis: A differential construction of a dialogue? Constructivist Foundations 13(2): 208–209. http://constructivist.info/13/2/208
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.