You are not logged in Log in


> About the Journal
> Board & Policy
> Guidelines for Authors
> Acknowledgment to Reviewers
> Constructivist Community: Authors
> Constructivist E-Paper Archive (CEPA)
> Call for Book Reviewers
> Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

LATEST ISSUES

Volume 14
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 13
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 12
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 11
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 10
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 9
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 8
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 7
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 6
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 5
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 4
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 3
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 2
Numbers 2–3
Number 1
Volume 1
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1

FOLLOW US

Login to provide us with feedback
Issues ┆ Submit ┆ FAQ ┆ Index
Volume 13 · Number 2 · Pages 270–272
< Previous Paper · Next Paper >
Diving Deeply into Radical Constructivism

Marco C. Bettoni

Download the full text in
PDF (122 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > 1 Comment

Share on

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Applying Radical Constructivism to Machine Learning: A Pilot Study in Assistive Robotics” by Markus Nowak, Claudio Castellini & Carlo Massironi. Upshot: Applying radical constructivism to machine learning is a challenge that requires us to dive very deeply into its theory of knowing and learning. We need to clarify its fundamental concepts, if possible, in operational terms. This commentary aims at outlining how this kind of clarification could look in the case of 3 such concepts: (a) the construction of experiential reality; (b) learning as a constructive activity; (c) the viability of conceptual structures.

Citation

Bettoni M. C. (2018) Diving deeply into radical constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 13(2): 270–272. http://constructivist.info/13/2/270

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Bettoni M. & Eggs C. (2010) User­centred knowledge management: A constructivist and socialized view. Constructivist Foundations 5(3): 130­143. http://constructivist.info/5/3/130
Bettoni M. (2018) Aufmerksamkeitsquanten: Bausteine autonomen und kreativen Denkens. In: Hug T., Mitterer J. & Schorner M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Ernst von Glasersfeld Centenary Conference. Innsbruck University Press, Innsbruck, in press. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ceccato S. (1964) A model of the mind. Methodos 61: 3–75 ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
de Bono E. (1991) I am right, you are wrong. Penguin Books, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
de Bono E. (1992) Serious creativity. Harper Collins, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1983) Learning as constructive activity. In: Bergeron J. C. & Herscovics N. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of the North American Group of Psychology in Mathematics Education, Vol. 1. PME-NA, Montreal: 41–101. http://cepa.info/1373
Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press, London. http://cepa.info/1462
Glasersfeld E. von (1999) How do we mean? A constructivist sketch of semantics. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 6(1): 9–16. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kant I. (1966) Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Edited by I. Heidemann. Reclam, Stuttgart. Edition A originally published in 1781, edition B in 1787. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 1

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.

Comment by Robert Modlitba · 10 Apr 2018
Hi
I am an undergrad student at Stockholm university who is very interested in RC. I have started a paper to structure my thoughts about RC and Luhmann’s system theory. Reading your paper i found my thoughts very similar to yours. I would be very thankful if you could read my paper and comment it.
You will find it at https://www.academia.edu/s/97c79a1cc8/understanding-luhmanns-system-theory
Best regards Robert