On Plasticity and Granularity in Artificial Life Models

Tuci, Elio

Volume 13 · Number 2 · Pages 292–293

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

On Plasticity and Granularity in Artificial Life Models

Elio Tuci

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Plasticity, Granularity and Multiple Contingency - Essentials for Conceiving an Artificial Constructivist Agent” by Manfred Füllsack. Upshot: My commentary contributes to the analysis of the agency-generating process from a constructivist epistemology by briefly reviewing two computational models, not cited by Füllsack, by Randall Beer and Ezequiel Di Paolo, respectively.

Citation

Tuci E. (2018) On plasticity and granularity in artificial life models. Constructivist Foundations 13(2): 292–293. http://constructivist.info/13/2/292

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Beer R. D. & Gallagher J. C. (1992) Evolving dynamical neural networks for adaptive behavior. Adaptive Behavior 1: 91–122. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Beer R. D. (2004) Autopoiesis and cognition in the game of life. Artificial Life 10(3): 309–326. http://cepa.info/1143

Di Paolo E. A. (2000) Behavioral coordination, structural congruence and entrainment in a simulation of acoustically coupled agents. Adaptive Behavior 8(1): 27–48. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Gardner M. (1983) Wheels, life and others mathematical amusements. W. H. Freeman, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1987) The tree of knowledge. Shambhala, Boston. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Pfeifer R. & Bongard J. (2007) How the body shapes the way we think: A new view of intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.

LATEST ISSUES

FOLLOW US

Abstract

Citation

References

Comments: 0