You are not logged in Log in


> About the Journal
> Board & Policies
> Guidelines for Authors
> Acknowledgment to Reviewers
> Constructivist Community: Authors
> Constructivist E-Paper Archive (CEPA)
> Call for Book Reviewers
> Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

LATEST ISSUES

Volume 17
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 16
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 15
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 14
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 13
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 12
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 11
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 10
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 9
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 8
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 7
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 6
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 5
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 4
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 3
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 2
Numbers 2–3
Number 1
Volume 1
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1

FOLLOW US

Login to provide us with feedback
Issues ┆ Submit ┆ FAQ ┆ Index
Volume 13 · Number 2 · Pages 298–300
< Previous Paper · Next Paper >
Three Other Challenges for Artificial Constructivist Agent from an Enactive Perspective

Pierre De Loor

Log in download the full text in PDF

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Share on

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Plasticity, Granularity and Multiple Contingency - Essentials for Conceiving an Artificial Constructivist Agent” by Manfred Füllsack. Upshot: This commentary aims to deepen the proposition made by Füllsack about the possibility of minimal constructivist agents from an enactive perspective. Even though I agree with the main purpose of his target article, I maintain that it could be interesting to go further and to introduce notions such as boundary, viability, multi-scale modelling and phenomenal domain separation. I also argue that the examples and models proposed in the target article are challenged by these concepts.

Citation

De Loor P. (2018) Three other challenges for artificial constructivist agent from an enactive perspective. Constructivist Foundations 13(2): 298–300. http://constructivist.info/13/2/298

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

De Loor P., Manac’h, K. & Chevaillier P. (2014) The memorization of in-line sensorimotor invariants: Toward behavioral ontogeny and enactive agents. Artificial Life and Robotics 19(2): 127–135. http://cepa.info/4552
De Loor P., Manac’h, K. & Tisseau J. (2009) Enaction-based artificial intelligence: Toward co-evolution with humans in the loop. Minds and Machines 19(3): 319–343. http://cepa.info/4547
Leon F. (2015) Stabilization methods for a multiagent system with complex behaviours. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2015: 236285. http://doi.org/10.1155/2015/236285
Manetti D. & Caiani S. Z. (eds.) (2011) Agency: From embodied cognition to free will. Special issue. Humana Mente 15. http://www.humanamente.eu/PDF/Issue15_CompletePDF.pdf
Varela F. J. (1979) Principles of biological autonomy. Elsevier/North-Holland, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.