Log in download the full text in PDF
Open peer commentary on the article “Plasticity, Granularity and Multiple Contingency - Essentials for Conceiving an Artificial Constructivist Agent” by Manfred Füllsack. Upshot: This commentary aims to deepen the proposition made by Füllsack about the possibility of minimal constructivist agents from an enactive perspective. Even though I agree with the main purpose of his target article, I maintain that it could be interesting to go further and to introduce notions such as boundary, viability, multi-scale modelling and phenomenal domain separation. I also argue that the examples and models proposed in the target article are challenged by these concepts.
De Loor P. (2018) Three other challenges for artificial constructivist agent from an enactive perspective. Constructivist Foundations 13(2): 298–300. http://constructivist.info/13/2/298
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.