The Plasticity of the Bodily Self: Head Movements in Bodily Illusions and Their Relation to Gallagher’s Body Image and Body Schema
Marte Roel Lesur, Michael Gaebler, Philippe Bertrand & Bigna Lenggenhager
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Context: The integration of sensorimotor signals and prior beliefs contribute to our sense of body. An influential framework in the study of the bodily self is Gallagher’s distinction between body image and body schema, which are roughly comparable to the perceived body and the lived body, respectively. Through systematic manipulations of sensorimotor signals, it is possible to induce the illusion of agency or ownership over foreign limbs or full bodies. Yet, there is diverging empirical evidence regarding the coherence of sensorimotor signals necessary to elicit such illusions. Problem: The large amount of empirical evidence and its relation to the concepts of body image and schema is not well understood and requires more fine-graded distinctions of various aspects of sensorimotor coherences. Method: We systematically discuss literature on sensorimotor coherence during bodily illusions and argue for the importance of distinguishing between head- and limb-related coherences. To support this discussion, we present new experimental findings where participants experienced a first-person perspective (1PP) full-body illusion over another human through the manipulation of hand-related visuotactile or visuomotor coherence. Results: Participants showed no significant reduction in ownership after asynchronous visuotactile, but after asynchronous visuomotor stimulation. Based on these results and the literature, we propose that head-related temporal sensorimotor coherences are necessary to integrate limb-related incoherent signals during full-body illusions. Furthermore, we speculate that during full-body illusions, head-related coherences are a binding factor between the body image and the body schema; that is, only through the coherent manipulation of the visual field over a 1PP resulting from an immersive image (body image) is our body schema manipulated. Implications: While yet to be experimentally tested, distinguishing head- and limb-related sensorimotor integration and their influences on body image and body schema could refine the study of the bodily self. Constructivist content: The plasticity of the bodily self - as shown in bodily illusions - reflects the dynamism of the subject as observer and its binding to its environment.
Citation
Roel Lesur M., Gaebler M., Bertrand P. & Lenggenhager B. (2018) The plasticity of the bodily self: Head movements in bodily illusions and their relation to Gallagher’s body image and body schema. Constructivist Foundations 14(1): 94–105. http://constructivist.info/14/1/094
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
References
Ahn S. J., Bostick J., Ogle E., Nowak K. L., McGillicuddy K. T. & Bailenson J. N. (2016) Experiencing nature: Embodying animals in immersive virtual environments increases inclusion of nature in self and involvement with nature. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 21(6): 399–419.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12173
Apps M. A. J. & Tsakiris M. (2014) The free-energy self: A predictive coding account of self-recognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 41: 85–97
http://cepa.info/5544
Aspell J. E., Heydrich L., Marillier G., Lavanchy T., Herbelin B. & Blanke O. (2013) Turning body and self inside out: Visualized heartbeats alter bodily self-consciousness and tactile perception. Psychological Science 24(12): 2445–2453.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bertrand P., González Franco D., Pointeau A. & Cherene C. (2014) The machine to be another: Embodied telepresence using human performers. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction. ACM, New York NY.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bertrand P., Guegan J., Robieux L., McCall C. A. & Zenasni F. (2018) Learning empathy through virtual reality: Multiple strategies for training empathy-related abilities using body ownership illusions in embodied virtual reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5: 26.
https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00026
Botvinick M. & Cohen J. (1998) Rubber hands “feel” touch that eyes see. Nature 391(6669): 756.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Caola B., Montalti M., Zanini A., Leadbetter A. & Martini M. (2018) The bodily illusion in adverse conditions: Virtual arm ownership during visuomotor mismatch. Perception 47(5): 477–491.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cheng C. I. & Wakefield G. H. (2001) Introduction to head-related transfer functions (HRTFs) Representations of HRTFs in time, frequency, and space. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 49(4): 231–249.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
de Vignemont F. (2010) Body schema and body image: Pros and cons. Neuropsychologia 48(3): 669–680.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ehrsson H. H. (2007) The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences. Science 317(5841): 1048–1048.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Flögel M., Kalveram K. T., Christ O. & Vogt J. (2016) Application of the rubber hand illusion paradigm: Comparison between upper and lower limbs. Psychological Research 80(2): 298–306.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gallagher S. (2005) Dynamic models of body schematic processes. In: De Preester H. & Knockaert V. (eds.) Body image and body schema. John Benjamins Publishers, Amsterdam: 233–250.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kokkinara E., Kilteni K., Blom K. J. & Slater M. (2016) First person perspective of seated participants over a walking virtual body leads to illusory agency over the walking. Scientific Reports 6: 28879.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28879
Kokkinara E., Slater M. & López-Moliner J. (2015) The effects of visuomotor calibration to the perceived space and body, through embodiment in immersive virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 13(1): 3.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lopez C. & Elzière M. (2017) Out-of-body experience in vestibular disorders: A prospective study of 210 patients with dizziness. Cortex 104: 193–206.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Macauda G., Bertolini G., Palla A., Straumann D., Brugger P. & Lenggenhager B. (2015) Binding body and self in visuo-vestibular conflicts. The European Journal of Neuroscience 41(6): 810–817.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maselli A., Kilteni K., López-Moliner J. & Slater M. (2016) The sense of body ownership relaxes temporal constraints for multisensory integration. Scientific Reports 6: 30628.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30628
Nilsson N. C., Peck T., Bruder G., Hodgson E., Serafin S., Whitton M., Steinicke F. & Rosenberg E. S. (2018) 15 years of research on redirected walking in immersive virtual environments. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 38(2): 44–56
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Petkova V. I., Khoshnevis M. & Ehrsson H. H. (2011) The perspective matters! Multisensory integration in ego-centric reference frames determines full-body ownership. Frontiers in Psychology 2: 35.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00035
Pfeiffer C., Serino A. & Blanke O. (2014) The vestibular system: A spatial reference for bodily self-consciousness. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 8: 31.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2014.00031
Sforza A., Bufalari I., Haggard P. & Aglioti S. M. (2010) My face in yours: Visuo-tactile facial stimulation influences sense of identity. Social Neuroscience 5(2): 148–162.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tajadura-Jiménez A., Marquardt T., Swapp D., Kitagawa N. & Bianchi-Berthouze N. (2016) Action sounds modulate arm reaching movements. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1391.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01391
Tsakiris M. & Haggard P. (2005) The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 31(1): 80–91.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.