Abstract
Open peer commentary on the article “The Plasticity of the Bodily Self: Head Movements in Bodily Illusions and Their Relation to Gallagher’s Body Image and Body Schema” by Marte Roel Lesur, Michael Gaebler, Philippe Bertrand & Bigna Lenggenhager. Abstract: Conflicting and puzzling results in bodily illusions research might arise because researchers have been operating under the false premise that they were studying illusions. I suggest that the rubber-hand and full-body illusions are not illusions after all, but something else entirely, and believing otherwise is succumbing to the illusion illusion.
Citation
Dieguez S. (2018) The illusion illusion. Constructivist Foundations 14(1): 108–110. http://constructivist.info/14/1/108
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
References
Botvinick M. & Cohen J. (1998) Rubber hands “feel” touch that eyes see. Nature 391(6669): 756.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Clark A. (2013) Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36: 181–253.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gendler T. S. (2008) Alief and belief. Journal of Philosophy 105(10): 634–663.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gillam B. (1998) Illusions at century’s end. In: Hochberg J. (ed.) Perception and cognition at century’s end. Academic Press, New York: 95–136.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gregory R. L. (1997) Knowledge in perception and illusion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 352: 1121–1128.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hayward V. (2008) A brief taxonomy of tactile illusions and demonstrations that can be done in a hardware store. Brain Research Bulletin 75: 742–752.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Orne M. T. (1962) On the social psychology of the psychological experiment. American Psychologist 17: 776–783.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.