An Analysis Procedure for the Micro-Phenomenological Interview
Camila Valenzuela-Moguillansky & Alejandra Vásquez-Rosati
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Context: The advent of the embodied approach to cognition produced a paradigm shift giving experience a primary place in the different fields of inquiry. This gave rise to the need to develop methodologies for the study of experience from a first-person perspective. In this context, micro-phenomenology emerges as a methodological tool that allows the study of experience in a systematic and rigorous way. Problem: To reproduce and share the micro-phenomenological analysis - crucial for the intersubjective validation of micro-phenomenological research - it is relevant to have a procedure that allows us to trace the different steps of the analysis. As many of the stages of the micro-phenomenological analysis remain implicit, a step-by-step description has not yet been produced. We describe the procedure of analysis of the micro-phenomenological interview, step by step, thus complementing the micro-phenomenological analysis method. Method: In order to specify the analysis procedure, we used the micro-phenomenological interview to explore our experience of abstracting, developing the example of an analysis carried out in the context of a specific investigation. Results: We propose an analysis procedure organized in a concertina-shaped structure. It has fifteen stages organized into five sections. Each surface of the concertina corresponds to one stage of the analysis. We identified grouping as an abstraction operation that participates in the very early stages of the categorization process. This operation participates in the categorization mechanism we called “iterative interrogation.” Moreover, we propose that the refinement of the structures results from a process that involves recursively contrasting the description of the experience, the understanding we have gained from it throughout the analysis and the resulting structures. Implications: The proposed procedure allows the tracing not only of the different steps of the analysis, but also of the criteria used to solve the numerous issues that arise throughout it. The iterative interrogation mechanism makes it possible to reveal, in an orderly manner, the principles used by the analyst to establish the diachronic and synchronic units. This greatly facilitates the communication of a process that is highly implicit. We hope this procedure will contribute to the establishment of standards in micro-phenomenological research, facilitating the exchange between researchers and thus consolidating the intersubjective validation procedures that make it possible to evaluate the quality of neuro- and micro-phenomenological research.
Key words: Micro-phenomenology, neurophenomenology, explicitation interview, iterative interrogation, first-person research, embodied approach, categorization, experience, synthesis process
Citation
Valenzuela-Moguillansky C. & Vásquez-Rosati A. (2019) An analysis procedure for the micro-phenomenological interview. Constructivist Foundations 14(2): 123–145. https://constructivist.info/14/2/123
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Austin J. L. (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford University Press, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Behnke E. A. (2012) Enduring: A phenomenological investigation. In: Koch S., Fuchs T., Summa M. & Müller C. (eds.) Body memory, metaphor and movement. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bourdier T., Cirstea H., Dougherty D. & Kirchner H. (2010) Extensional and intensional strategies. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 15: 1–19.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Caldwell C. (2016) Body identity development: Definitions and discussions. Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy 11(4): 220–234.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Craig A. D. (2002) How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3(8): 655–666.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Delattre P. (1971) Système, structure, fonction, évolution. Maloine, Paris.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Donohoe J. (2017) Place and phenomenology. Rowman & Littlefield International, Lanham ML.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Husserl E. (1983) Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: General introduction to a pure phenemenology. First Book. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ingold T. (2011) Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Khalsa S. S. & Lapidus R. C. (2016) Can interoception improve the pragmatic search for biomarkers in psychiatry? Frontiers in Psychiatry 7: 121.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lakoff G. (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Levine P. A. (2010) In an Unspoken Voice: How the body releases trauma and restores goodness. North Atlantic Books, Berkeley CA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1978) Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In: Miller G. & Lenneberg E. (eds.) Psychology and biology of language and thought. Academic Press, New York
https://cepa.info/549
Mehling W. E., Wrubel J., Daubenmier J. J., Price C. J., Kerr C. E., Silow T., Gopisetty V. & Stewart A. L. (2011) Body awareness: A phenomenological inquiry into the common ground of mind-body therapies. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 6: 6.
http://www.peh-med.com/content/6/1/6
Moneglia M. (2011) Spoken corpora and pragmatics. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 11(2) 479–519.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
O’Regan K. J. & Noé A. (2001) A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(05) 939–973
https://cepa.info/2285
Petitmengin C. (2006) Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5: 229–269
https://cepa.info/2376
Preti D. (1999) O discurso oral culto. Second edition. Humanitas Publicações – FFLCH/USP, São Paulo.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schandry R. (1981) Heart beat perception and emotional experience. Psychophysiology 18(4): 483–488.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Terhaar J., Campos Viola F., Bär K.-J. & Debener S. (2012) Heartbeat evoked potentials mirror altered body perception in depressed patients. Clinical Neurophysiology 123(10): 1950–1957.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tsakiris M., Tajadura-Jiménez A. & Costantini M. (2011) Just a heartbeat away from one’s body: Interoceptive sensitivity predicts malleability of body-representations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278(1717): 2470–2476.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Van Manen M. (1990) Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. The State University of New York Press, Albany NY.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1992) Autopoiesis and a biology of intentionality. In: McMullin B. (ed.) Proceedings of the workshop “Autopoiesis and Perception.” Dublin City University, Dublin
https://cepa.info/1274
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.
