Volume 14 · Number 2 · Pages 123–145
An Analysis Procedure for the Micro-Phenomenological Interview

Camila Valenzuela-Moguillansky & Alejandra Vásquez-Rosati

Download the full text in
PDF (1290 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Context: The advent of the embodied approach to cognition produced a paradigm shift giving experience a primary place in the different fields of inquiry. This gave rise to the need to develop methodologies for the study of experience from a first-person perspective. In this context, micro-phenomenology emerges as a methodological tool that allows the study of experience in a systematic and rigorous way. Problem: To reproduce and share the micro-phenomenological analysis - crucial for the intersubjective validation of micro-phenomenological research - it is relevant to have a procedure that allows us to trace the different steps of the analysis. As many of the stages of the micro-phenomenological analysis remain implicit, a step-by-step description has not yet been produced. We describe the procedure of analysis of the micro-phenomenological interview, step by step, thus complementing the micro-phenomenological analysis method. Method: In order to specify the analysis procedure, we used the micro-phenomenological interview to explore our experience of abstracting, developing the example of an analysis carried out in the context of a specific investigation. Results: We propose an analysis procedure organized in a concertina-shaped structure. It has fifteen stages organized into five sections. Each surface of the concertina corresponds to one stage of the analysis. We identified grouping as an abstraction operation that participates in the very early stages of the categorization process. This operation participates in the categorization mechanism we called “iterative interrogation.” Moreover, we propose that the refinement of the structures results from a process that involves recursively contrasting the description of the experience, the understanding we have gained from it throughout the analysis and the resulting structures. Implications: The proposed procedure allows the tracing not only of the different steps of the analysis, but also of the criteria used to solve the numerous issues that arise throughout it. The iterative interrogation mechanism makes it possible to reveal, in an orderly manner, the principles used by the analyst to establish the diachronic and synchronic units. This greatly facilitates the communication of a process that is highly implicit. We hope this procedure will contribute to the establishment of standards in micro-phenomenological research, facilitating the exchange between researchers and thus consolidating the intersubjective validation procedures that make it possible to evaluate the quality of neuro- and micro-phenomenological research.

Key words: Micro-phenomenology, neurophenomenology, explicitation interview, iterative interrogation, first-person research, embodied approach, categorization, experience, synthesis process


Valenzuela-Moguillansky C. & Vásquez-Rosati A. (2019) An analysis procedure for the micro-phenomenological interview. Constructivist Foundations 14(2): 123–145. https://constructivist.info/14/2/123

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Ollagnier-Beldame M. & Coupé C. (2019) Meeting You for the First Time: Descriptive Categories of an Intersubjective Experience
Vörös S. & Bitbol M. (2017) Enacting Enaction: A Dialectic Between Knowing and Being
Beaton M. (2013) Phenomenology and Embodied Action
Solomonova E. & Sha X. W. (2016) Exploring the Depth of Dream Experience: The Enactive Framework and Methods for Neurophenomenological Research
Colombetti G. (2013) Some Ideas for the Integration of Neurophenomenology and Affective Neuroscience


Austin J. L. (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford University Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Behnke E. A. (2012) Enduring: A phenomenological investigation. In: Koch S., Fuchs T., Summa M. & Müller C. (eds.) Body memory, metaphor and movement. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bitbol M. & Petitmengin C. (2011) On pure reflection: A reply to Dan Zahavi. Journal of Consciousness Studies 18(2) 24–37 https://cepa.info/4449
Bitbol M. & Petitmengin C. (2013) A defense of introspection from within. Constructivist Foundations 8(3) 269–279 https://constructivist.info/8/3/269
Bitbol M. (2017) Phenoneurology. Constructivist Foundations 12(2) 150–153 https://constructivist.info/12/2/150
Bourdier T., Cirstea H., Dougherty D. & Kirchner H. (2010) Extensional and intensional strategies. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 15: 1–19. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Caldwell C. (2016) Body identity development: Definitions and discussions. Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy 11(4): 220–234. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Colombetti G. (2013) Affective science meets the enactive mind. MIT Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Craig A. D. (2002) How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3(8): 655–666. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Delattre P. (1971) Système, structure, fonction, évolution. Maloine, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Depraz N., Gyemant M. & Desmidt T. (2017) A first-person analysis using third-person data as a generative method: A case study of surprise in depression. Constructivist Foundations 12(2) 190–218 https://constructivist.info/12/2/190
Donohoe J. (2017) Place and phenomenology. Rowman & Littlefield International, Lanham ML. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fuchs T. & Koch S. C. (2014) Embodied affectivity: On moving and being moved. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00508
Fuchs T. & Schlimme J. E. (2009) Embodiment and psychopathology: A phenomenological perspective. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 22: 570–575 https://cepa.info/2275
Husserl E. (1983) Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: General introduction to a pure phenemenology. First Book. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ingold T. (2011) Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
James W. (1891) The principles of psychology. Macmillan and Co, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Khalsa S. S. & Lapidus R. C. (2016) Can interoception improve the pragmatic search for biomarkers in psychiatry? Frontiers in Psychiatry 7: 121. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lakoff G. & Johnson M. (2003) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lakoff G. (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Le Van Quyen M. & Petitmengin C. (2002) Neuronal dynamics and conscious experience: An example of reciprocal causation before epileptic seizures. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1: 169–180 https://cepa.info/4458
Levine P. A. (2010) In an Unspoken Voice: How the body releases trauma and restores goodness. North Atlantic Books, Berkeley CA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lutz A., Lachaux J.-P., Martinerie J. & Varela F. J. (2002) Guiding the study of brain dynamics by using first-person data: Synchrony patterns correlate with ongoing conscious states during a simple visual task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99(3) 1586–91 https://cepa.info/2092
Maturana H. R. (1978) Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In: Miller G. & Lenneberg E. (eds.) Psychology and biology of language and thought. Academic Press, New York https://cepa.info/549
Mehling W. E., Wrubel J., Daubenmier J. J., Price C. J., Kerr C. E., Silow T., Gopisetty V. & Stewart A. L. (2011) Body awareness: A phenomenological inquiry into the common ground of mind-body therapies. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 6: 6. http://www.peh-med.com/content/6/1/6
Merleau-Ponty M. (1945) Phénoménologie de la perception. Gallimard, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Moneglia M. (2011) Spoken corpora and pragmatics. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 11(2) 479–519. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
O’Regan K. J. & Noé A. (2001) A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(05) 939–973 https://cepa.info/2285
Petitmengin C. & Bitbol M. (2009) The validity of first-person descriptions as authenticity and coherence. Journal of Consciousness Studies 16(10–12): 363–404 https://cepa.info/2377
Petitmengin C. (1999) The intuitive experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(2–3): 43–47 https://cepa.info/2411
Petitmengin C. (2001) L’expérience intuitive. Paris: Editions L’Harmattan. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Petitmengin C. (2006) Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5: 229–269 https://cepa.info/2376
Petitmengin C. (2017) Enaction as a lived experience towards a radical neurophenomenology. Constructivist Foundations 12(2) 139–165 https://constructivist.info/12/2/139
Petitmengin C., Remillieux A. & Valenzuela-Moguillansky C. (2018) Discovering the structures of lived experience : Towards a micro-phenomenological analysis method. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences: First Online. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Petitmengin C., Remillieux A., Cahour B. & Carter-Thomas S. (2013) A gap in Nisbett and Wilson’s findings? A first-person access to our cognitive processes. Consciousness and Cognition 22(2) 654–669 https://cepa.info/931
Preti D. (1999) O discurso oral culto. Second edition. Humanitas Publicações – FFLCH/USP, São Paulo. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schandry R. (1981) Heart beat perception and emotional experience. Psychophysiology 18(4): 483–488. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Taivalsaari A. (1996) On the notion of cognition. Computing Surveys 28(3): 438–479. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0303006
Terhaar J., Campos Viola F., Bär K.-J. & Debener S. (2012) Heartbeat evoked potentials mirror altered body perception in depressed patients. Clinical Neurophysiology 123(10): 1950–1957. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tsakiris M., Tajadura-Jiménez A. & Costantini M. (2011) Just a heartbeat away from one’s body: Interoceptive sensitivity predicts malleability of body-representations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278(1717): 2470–2476. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Valenzuela-Moguillansky C. (2013) Pain and body awareness: An exploration of the bodily experience of persons suffering from fibromyalgia. Constructivist Foundations 8(3): 339–350 https://constructivist.info/8/3/339
Valenzuela-Moguillansky C. O’Regan J. K. & Petitmengin C. (2013) Exploring the subjective experience of the rubber hand illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 659. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00659
Valenzuela-Moguillansky C., Vásquez-Rosati A. & Riegler A. (2017) Building a science of experience: Neurophenomenology and related disciplines. Constructivist Foundations 12(2): 131–138 https://constructivist.info/12/2/131
Van Manen M. (1990) Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. The State University of New York Press, Albany NY. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1992) Autopoiesis and a biology of intentionality. In: McMullin B. (ed.) Proceedings of the workshop “Autopoiesis and Perception.” Dublin City University, Dublin https://cepa.info/1274
Varela F. J. (1996) Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3(4) 330–349 https://cepa.info/1893
Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vásquez-Rosati A. (2017) Body awareness to recognize feelings: The exploration of a musical emotional experience. Constructivist Foundations 12(2) 219 https://constructivist.info/12/2/219
Vermersch P. (2011) L’entretien d’explicitation. Seventh edition. ESF Editeur, Issy-les-Moulineaux. Originally published in 1994. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vermersch P. (2012) Explicitation et phénoménologie: vers une psychophénoménologie. Presses universitaires de France, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vörös S. (2014) The uroboros of consciousness between the naturalisation of phenomenology and the phenomenologisation of nature. Constructivist Foundations 10(1): 96–119 https://constructivist.info/10/1/096
Zahavi D. (2011) Varieties of reflection. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 18(2): 9–19. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.