Meeting You for the First Time: Descriptive Categories of an Intersubjective Experience
Magali Ollagnier-Beldame & Christophe D. M. Coupé
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Context: There is little research currently on first encounters with a first-person epistemology and empirical evidence. Problem: We want to provide an answer to the question: “What is the lived experience of being with others for the first time?” Method: We rely on a first-person epistemology and a second-person method, namely the explicitation interview, a technique of guided retrospective introspection. We analyze a corpus of 24 interviews conducted after planned first encounters. We identify generic descriptive categories of subjects’ lived experience. Results: We propose a typology of the micro-moments that constitute people’s intersubjective experiences during first encounters. We identify five descriptive categories of these experiences: act, mode of intersubjectivity, sense of agency, experiential modality, and content in terms of involved persons. Implications: This article highlights what a careful investigation of subjective experience can bring to the understanding of intersubjectivity. It shows in particular how an applied phenomenology can complement and revisit less empirical philosophical approaches. It can be useful to scholars conducting third-person studies on first encounters. This study is a first step toward investigating more spontaneous encounters, occurring for instance in everyday situations or in less usual settings. We are currently analyzing interviews on first encounters between health practitioners and their clients, which will offer practical advice to both sides. Constructivist content: Constructivist approaches argue that “reality” is actively brought forth by the subject rather than passively acquired. Questioning the separation between the objective world and subjective experience, they examine how people build their own reality through their perceptions, through their experience of the world, and through their interactions with others. Our study focuses on first encounters “from within,” listening to subjects’ accounts of their lived experience. We aim to defend and promote the experiential perspective in the field of cognitive science. We therefore follow Francisco Varela, Evan Thompson and Eleanor Rosch, for whom the “concern is to open a space of possibilities in which the circulation between cognitive science and human experience can be fully appreciated and to foster the transformative possibilities of human experience in a scientific culture.”
Key words: Intersubjectivity, experience, first encounter, first-person epistemology, micro-phenomenology, explicitation interview, micro-experiential phenomenon, generic descriptive category
Supplementary Material: Document 1
Citation
Ollagnier-Beldame M. & Coupé C. D. M. (2019) Meeting you for the first time: Descriptive categories of an intersubjective experience. Constructivist Foundations 14(2): 167–180. https://constructivist.info/14/2/167
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Abreu J. M. (1999) Conscious and nonconscious African American stereotypes: Impact on first impression and diagnostic ratings by therapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 67(3): 387–93.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ambady A. (2010) The perils of pondering: Intuition and thin slice judgments. Psychological Inquiry 21(4): 271–278.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Aron A., Aron E. N. & Smollan D. (1992) Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63(4): 596–612.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Battle M. (2000) A theology of community: The Ubuntu theology of Desmond Tutu. Interpretation Journal of Bible and Theology 54(2): 173–182.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Branscombe N. R. & Smith E. R. (1990) Gender and racial stereotypes in impression formation and social decision-making processes. Sex Roles 22(9–10): 627–647.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ciccone A. (2006) Partage d’expériences et rythmicité dans le travail de subjectivation. Le Carnet PSY 109(5): 29–34.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
De Jaegher H. (2015) How we affect each other: Michel Henry’s “pathos-with” and the enactive approach to intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies 22(1–2): 112–132
https://cepa.info/5641
Delmotte F. (2010) Termes clés de la sociologie de Norbert Elias. Vingtième Siècle. Revue d’histoire 106(7): 29–36.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dukes K. & Maddox K. B. (2008) Social categorization and beyond: How facial features impact social judgment. In: Ambady N. & Skowronski J. J. (eds.) First Impressions. Guilford Press, New York NY: 205–233.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Evans K. R., Kleine R. E., Landry T. D. & Crosby L. A. (2000) How first impressions of a customer impact effectiveness in an initial sales encounter. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28(4): 512–526.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hilsenroth M. J. & Cromer T. D. (2007) Clinician interventions related to alliance during the initial interview and psychological assessment. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 44(2): 205–18.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Husserl E. (1960) Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology, translation by Dorion Cairns. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague. German original published in 1933.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lutz A., Lachaux J.-P., Martinerie J. & Varela FJ. (2002) Guiding the study of brain dynamics by using first-person data: Synchrony patterns correlate with ongoing conscious states during a simple visual task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 1586–91
https://cepa.info/2092
Martin J. & Gillespie A. (2010) A neo-Meadian approach to human agency: Relating the social and the psychological in the ontogenesis of perspective – coordinating persons. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 44: 252–272.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mead G. H. (1934) Mind, self and society. The Chicago University Press, Chicago.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Merleau-Ponty M. (1965) Phenomenology of perception. Translated by Colin Smith. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. French original published as: Merleau-Ponty M. (1945) Phénoménologie de la perception. Gallimard, Paris.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Misrahi R. (2012) Présentation inédite de la traduction française de Ich und Du (Martin Buber, 1923) Aubier, Paris.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Moscovici S. (2000) Social representations: Explorations in social psychology. Polity Press, Cambridge.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Petitmengin C. (2006) Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5: 229–269
https://cepa.info/2376
Saldaña J. (2011) Fundamentals of qualitative research. First edition. Oxford University Press, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schacter D. (2001) The seven sins of memory. Houghton Mifflin, Boston MA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schiller D., Freeman J. B., Mitchell J. P., Uleman J. S. & Phelps E. A. (2009) A neural mechanism of first impressions. Nature Neuroscience 12(4): 508–514.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sexton H., Littauer H., Sexton A. & Tømmerås E. (2005) Building an alliance: Early therapy process and the client–therapist connection. Psychotherapy Research 15(1–2): 103–116.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stern D. (2004) The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. W. W. Norton, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vermersch P. (1994) L’entretien d’explicitation en formation initiale et en formation continue. Editions Sociales Françaises, Paris.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vermersch P. (2000) Approche du singulier. In: Centre de recherche sur la formation du Conservatoire national des arts et métiers (ed.) L’Analyse de la singularité de l’action. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris: 239–266.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vermersch P. (2017) Au-delà des limites de l’introspection descriptive: L’inconscient organisationnel et les lois d’association. Expliciter 114: 1–17.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Willis J. & Todorov A. (2006) First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science 17(7): 592–598.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Yeung V. W. L. & Kashima Y. (2010) Communicating stereotype-relevant information: How readily can people individuate? Asian Journal of Social Psychology 13: 209–220.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.
