Volume 14 · Number 2 · Pages 167–180
Meeting You for the First Time: Descriptive Categories of an Intersubjective Experience

Magali Ollagnier-Beldame & Christophe D. M. Coupé

Log in to download the full text for free

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Context: There is little research currently on first encounters with a first-person epistemology and empirical evidence. Problem: We want to provide an answer to the question: “What is the lived experience of being with others for the first time?” Method: We rely on a first-person epistemology and a second-person method, namely the explicitation interview, a technique of guided retrospective introspection. We analyze a corpus of 24 interviews conducted after planned first encounters. We identify generic descriptive categories of subjects’ lived experience. Results: We propose a typology of the micro-moments that constitute people’s intersubjective experiences during first encounters. We identify five descriptive categories of these experiences: act, mode of intersubjectivity, sense of agency, experiential modality, and content in terms of involved persons. Implications: This article highlights what a careful investigation of subjective experience can bring to the understanding of intersubjectivity. It shows in particular how an applied phenomenology can complement and revisit less empirical philosophical approaches. It can be useful to scholars conducting third-person studies on first encounters. This study is a first step toward investigating more spontaneous encounters, occurring for instance in everyday situations or in less usual settings. We are currently analyzing interviews on first encounters between health practitioners and their clients, which will offer practical advice to both sides. Constructivist content: Constructivist approaches argue that “reality” is actively brought forth by the subject rather than passively acquired. Questioning the separation between the objective world and subjective experience, they examine how people build their own reality through their perceptions, through their experience of the world, and through their interactions with others. Our study focuses on first encounters “from within,” listening to subjects’ accounts of their lived experience. We aim to defend and promote the experiential perspective in the field of cognitive science. We therefore follow Francisco Varela, Evan Thompson and Eleanor Rosch, for whom the “concern is to open a space of possibilities in which the circulation between cognitive science and human experience can be fully appreciated and to foster the transformative possibilities of human experience in a scientific culture.”

Key words: Intersubjectivity, experience, first encounter, first-person epistemology, micro-phenomenology, explicitation interview, micro-experiential phenomenon, generic descriptive category

Supplementary Material: Document 1


Ollagnier-Beldame M. & Coupé C. D. M. (2019) Meeting you for the first time: Descriptive categories of an intersubjective experience. Constructivist Foundations 14(2): 167–180. https://constructivist.info/14/2/167

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Valenzuela-Moguillansky C. & Vásquez-Rosati A. (2019) An Analysis Procedure for the Micro-Phenomenological Interview
Depraz N. (2021) The Lived Experience of Being Fragile: On Becoming more “Living” During the Pandemic
Vörös S. (2014) The Uroboros of Consciousness: Between the Naturalisation of Phenomenology and the Phenomenologisation of Nature
Coupé C. & Ollagnier-Beldame M. (2019) Epoché, Verbal Descriptions and Corpus Size in the Conduct and Analysis of Explicitation Interviews
Vörös S. & Bitbol M. (2017) Enacting Enaction: A Dialectic Between Knowing and Being


Abreu J. M. (1999) Conscious and nonconscious African American stereotypes: Impact on first impression and diagnostic ratings by therapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 67(3): 387–93. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ambady A. (2010) The perils of pondering: Intuition and thin slice judgments. Psychological Inquiry 21(4): 271–278. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Aron A., Aron E. N. & Smollan D. (1992) Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63(4): 596–612. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ataria Y., Dor-Ziderman Y. & Berkovich-Ohana A. (2015) How does it feel to lack a sense of boundaries? A case study of a long-term mindfulness meditator. Consciousness and Cognition 37: 133–147. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bar M., Neta M. & Linz H. (2006) Very first impressions. Emotion 6(2): 269–278. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Battle M. (2000) A theology of community: The Ubuntu theology of Desmond Tutu. Interpretation Journal of Bible and Theology 54(2): 173–182. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bourdieu P. (1980) Le sens pratique. Editions de Minuit, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Branscombe N. R. & Smith E. R. (1990) Gender and racial stereotypes in impression formation and social decision-making processes. Sex Roles 22(9–10): 627–647. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ciccone A. (2006) Partage d’expériences et rythmicité dans le travail de subjectivation. Le Carnet PSY 109(5): 29–34. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
De Jaegher H. & Di Paolo E. (2007) Participatory sense-making. An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4): 485–507 https://cepa.info/2387
De Jaegher H. (2015) How we affect each other: Michel Henry’s “pathos-with” and the enactive approach to intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies 22(1–2): 112–132 https://cepa.info/5641
De Jaegher H., Pieper B., Clénin D. & Fuchs T. (2017) Grasping intersubjectivity: An invitation to embody social interaction research. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16(3): 491–523 https://cepa.info/4350
Delmotte F. (2010) Termes clés de la sociologie de Norbert Elias. Vingtième Siècle. Revue d’histoire 106(7): 29–36. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Depraz N., Gyemant M. & Desmidt T. (2017) A first-person analysis using third-person data as a generative method: A case study of surprise in depression. Constructivist Foundations 12(2): 190–203 https://constructivist.info/12/2/190
Depraz N., Varela F. & Vermersch P. (2003) On becoming aware. John Benjamin, Amsterdam. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dukes K. & Maddox K. B. (2008) Social categorization and beyond: How facial features impact social judgment. In: Ambady N. & Skowronski J. J. (eds.) First Impressions. Guilford Press, New York NY: 205–233. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Evans K. R., Kleine R. E., Landry T. D. & Crosby L. A. (2000) How first impressions of a customer impact effectiveness in an initial sales encounter. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28(4): 512–526. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fiebich A. & Gallagher S. (2013) Joint attention in joint action. Philosophical Psychology: 26–4: 571–587. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Froese T., Iizuka H. & Ikegami T. (2014) Using minimal human-computer interfaces for studying the interactive development of social awareness. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1061. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01061
Fuchs T. & De Jaegher H. (2009) Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8(4): 465–486 https://cepa.info/2274
Haggard P. & Eitam B. (2015) The sense of agency. Oxford University Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Heavey C. L., Hurlburt R. T. & Lefforge N. L. (2012) Toward a phenomenology of feelings. Emotion 12(4): 763–777. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Heidegger M. (1976) On the way to language. Harper & Row, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hilsenroth M. J. & Cromer T. D. (2007) Clinician interventions related to alliance during the initial interview and psychological assessment. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 44(2): 205–18. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Husserl E. (1960) Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology, translation by Dorion Cairns. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague. German original published in 1933. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kimura B. (1972) Between a person and a person. Kobundo, Tokyo. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kordeš U. & Demšar E. (2018) Excavating belief about past experience: Experiential dynamics of the reflective act. Constructivist Foundations 13(2): 219–229 https://constructivist.info/13/2/219
Lutz A., Lachaux J.-P., Martinerie J. & Varela FJ. (2002) Guiding the study of brain dynamics by using first-person data: Synchrony patterns correlate with ongoing conscious states during a simple visual task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 1586–91 https://cepa.info/2092
Martin J. & Gillespie A. (2010) A neo-Meadian approach to human agency: Relating the social and the psychological in the ontogenesis of perspective – coordinating persons. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 44: 252–272. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
McCarthy J. & Wright P. (2004) Technology as experience. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mead G. H. (1934) Mind, self and society. The Chicago University Press, Chicago. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Merleau-Ponty M. (1965) Phenomenology of perception. Translated by Colin Smith. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. French original published as: Merleau-Ponty M. (1945) Phénoménologie de la perception. Gallimard, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Misrahi R. (2012) Présentation inédite de la traduction française de Ich und Du (Martin Buber, 1923) Aubier, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Moscovici S. (2000) Social representations: Explorations in social psychology. Polity Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nagel T. (1974) What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review 83(4): 435–450 https://cepa.info/2399
Nisbett R. E. & Wilson T. D. (1977) Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 84(3): 231–259 https://cepa.info/4724
Petitmengin C. & Bitbol M. (2009) The validity of first-person descriptions as authenticity and coherence. Journal of Consciousness Studies 16(10–12): 363–404 https://cepa.info/2377
Petitmengin C. (2006) Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5: 229–269 https://cepa.info/2376
Petitmengin C., Remillieux A., Cahour B. & Carter-Thomas S. (2013) A gap in Nisbett and Wilson’s findings? A first-person access to our cognitive processes. Consciousness and Cognition 22(2): 654–669 https://cepa.info/931
Reddy V. (2008) How infants know minds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Saldaña J. (2011) Fundamentals of qualitative research. First edition. Oxford University Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schacter D. (2001) The seven sins of memory. Houghton Mifflin, Boston MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schiller D., Freeman J. B., Mitchell J. P., Uleman J. S. & Phelps E. A. (2009) A neural mechanism of first impressions. Nature Neuroscience 12(4): 508–514. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sexton H., Littauer H., Sexton A. & Tømmerås E. (2005) Building an alliance: Early therapy process and the client–therapist connection. Psychotherapy Research 15(1–2): 103–116. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stern D. (2004) The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. W. W. Norton, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tisseron S., Virole B., Givre P., Tordo F., Triclot M. & Leroux Y. (2013) Subjectivation et empathie dans les mondes numériques. Dunod, Paris. https://doi.org/10.3917/dunod.tisse.2013.01
Tomasello M. (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (1993) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge. Originally published in 1991. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vermersch P. (1994) L’entretien d’explicitation en formation initiale et en formation continue. Editions Sociales Françaises, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vermersch P. (2000) Approche du singulier. In: Centre de recherche sur la formation du Conservatoire national des arts et métiers (ed.) L’Analyse de la singularité de l’action. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris: 239–266. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vermersch P. (2006) Vécus et couches des vécus. Expliciter 66: 32–47. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vermersch P. (2012) Explicitation et phénoménologie. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vermersch P. (2017) Au-delà des limites de l’introspection descriptive: L’inconscient organisationnel et les lois d’association. Expliciter 114: 1–17. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Willis J. & Todorov A. (2006) First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science 17(7): 592–598. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Yeung V. W. L. & Kashima Y. (2010) Communicating stereotype-relevant information: How readily can people individuate? Asian Journal of Social Psychology 13: 209–220. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.