You are not logged in Log in


> About the Journal
> Board & Policies
> Guidelines for Authors
> Acknowledgment to Reviewers
> Constructivist Community: Authors
> Constructivist E-Paper Archive (CEPA)
> Call for Book Reviewers
> Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

LATEST ISSUES

Volume 17
Number 1
Volume 16
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 15
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 14
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 13
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 12
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 11
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 10
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 9
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 8
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 7
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 6
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 5
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 4
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 3
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 2
Numbers 2–3
Number 1
Volume 1
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1

FOLLOW US

Login to provide us with feedback
Issues ┆ Submit ┆ FAQ ┆ Index
Volume 14 · Number 2 · Pages 191–193
< Previous Paper · Next Paper >
On the Relation between Theory and Experience, and the Intersubjective Nature of the Human Mind

Toma Strle

Log in download the full text in PDF

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Share on

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Meeting You for the First Time: Descriptive Categories of an Intersubjective Experience” by Magali Ollagnier-Beldame & Christophe Coupé. Abstract: I argue that the connection between the theoretical claims of the introductory part of the target article and the presented empirical findings on different modes of intersubjectivity is rather tenuous. Further, I touch upon the quandary of whether second-person research on intersubjective experience targets the same level of description of intersubjectivity compared with the theoretical accounts of intersubjectivity. I end with a discussion on why understanding the dynamics of intersubjectivity is essential to cognitive science.

Citation

Strle T. (2019) On the relation between theory and experience, and the intersubjective nature of the human mind. Constructivist Foundations 14(2): 191–193. https://constructivist.info/14/2/191

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Kordeš U. (2016) Going beyond theory: Constructivism and empirical phenomenology. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 375–385. https://cepa.info/2589
Merleau-Ponty M. (1962) Phenomenology of perception. Translated by Colin Smith. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London. Originally published in French as: Merleau-Ponty M. (1945) Phénoménologie de la perception. Gallimard, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Strle T. & Markič O. (2018) Looping effects of neurolaw, and the precarious marriage between neuroscience and the law. Balkan Journal of Philosophy 10(1): 17–26. https://cepa.info/5667
Strle T. (2016) On the necessity of foundations, intersubjectivity and cognitive science. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 387–389. https://constructivist.info/11/2/387
Strle T. (2018) Looping minds: How cognitive science exerts influence on its findings. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 16(4): 533–544. https://cepa.info/5666
Varela F. J. (1984) The creative circle: Sketches on the natural history of circularity. In: Watzlawick P. (ed.) The invented reality: Contributions to constructivism. W. W. Norton, New York: 309–325. http: //cepa.info/2089. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zahavi D. (2001) Beyond empathy: Phenomenological approaches to intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(5–7): 151–167. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.