Maker Education: Where Is the Knowledge Construction?
José Armando Valente & Paulo Blikstein
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Context: The construction of a product is fundamental. However, students’ having produced something is not enough to ensure that they have constructed knowledge. Problem: The objective of this article is to understand how maker education can contribute to the process of students’ knowledge construction. Method: Initially we discuss aspects related to the theory of constructionism, subsequently, using Piaget’s notions of conceptualization, we discuss how knowledge can be constructed in a makerspace, then turn to a case study that illustrates our theoretical commentary, and end with conclusions about our main research question: “Where is the knowledge construction in making?” Results: We show that in makerspaces students can develop sophisticated artifacts by using digital technologies, and that besides the product, this process allows for the representation of the actions with these machines, expressed as concepts and strategies used. Implications: The action representation constitutes the “window into the mind” of the learner, allowing one to understand and identify the knowledge used and, with that, help the learner reach a new stage in knowledge construction. However, in order to know whether the student has constructed knowledge, the teacher can use different strategies, such as Piaget’s clinical method, analysis of results gathered throughout product testing, and use of simulation software related to concepts involved in the maker activity. Constructivist content: The discussion in this article is based on Papert’s constructionist ideas. However, we use Piaget’s distinction between success and understanding to discuss how knowledge can be constructed by students in makerspaces. Key words: Makerspaces, fabrication technologies, constructionism, knowledge evaluation.
Citation
Valente J. A. & Blikstein P. (2019) Maker education: Where is the knowledge construction? Constructivist Foundations 14(3): 252–262. https://constructivist.info/14/3/252
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
References
Ackermann E. K. (2003) Hidden drivers of pedagogic transactions: Teachers as clinicians and designers. In: Correia S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th European Logo conference, Porto, Portugal, Agosto de 2003. Cnotinfor, Porto: 29–37.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Anderson C. (2012) Makers: The new industrial revolution. Crown, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Blikstein P. & Worsley M. (2016) Children are not Hackers: Building a culture of powerful ideas, deep learning, and equity in the Maker Movement. In: Peppler K., Halverson E. & Kafai Y. (eds.) Makeology: Makerspaces as learning environments. Volume 1. Routledge, New York NY: 64–79.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Blikstein P. (2013) Digital fabrication and “making” in education: The democratization of invention. In: Walter-Herrmann J. & Büching C. (eds.) FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors. Transcript Publishers, Bielefeld: 203–221.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Blikstein P. (2014) Bifocal modeling: Promoting authentic scientific inquiry through exploring and comparing real and ideal systems linked in real-time. In: Nijholt A. (ed.) Playful user interfaces: Interfaces that invite social and physical interaction. Springer, Singapore: 317–352.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Blikstein P. (2018) Maker movement in education: History and prospects. In: De Vries M. (ed.) Handbook of technology education. Springer, Cham: 419–437.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Carraher T. N. (1989) O método clínico: Usando os exames de Piaget [The clinical method: Using Piaget’s tests]. Cortez Ed, São Paulo.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Clapp E. P., Ross J., Ryan J. O. & Tishman S. (2017) Maker-centered learning: Empowering young people to share their worlds. Jossey Bass, San Francisco.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Delval J. (2002) Introdução à prática do método clínico: Descobrindo o pensamento das crianças [Introduction to the clinical method: Discovering children’s thinking]. Artmed, Porto Alegre.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dougherty D. (2013) The maker mindset. In: Honey M. & Kanter D. E. (eds.) Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators. Routledge, London: 7–11.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Freinet C. (1998) Educação pelo trabalho [Education through work]. Martins Fontes, São Paulo.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Freire P. (2008) Pedagogia da autonomia: Saberes necessários à prática educativa [Pedagogy of autonomy: Knowledge necessary for educational practice]. 37th edition. Paz e Terra, São Paulo.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Halverson E. R. & Kimberly M. S. (2014) The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review 84(4): 495–504.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Martinez S. L. & Stager G. (2013) Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Constructing Modern Knowledge Press, Santa Barbara.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Matui J. (1995) Construtivismo: Teoria construtivista sócio-histórica aplicada ao ensino [Constructivism: Socio-historical constructivist theory applied to teaching]. Editora Moderna, São Paulo.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Montessori M. (1965) Spontaneous activity in education. Schocken Books, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Papert S. (1986) Constructionism: A new opportunity for elementary science education. A proposal to the National Science Foundation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Media Laboratory, Epistemology and Learning Group, Cambridge MA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Piaget J. (1929) The child’s conception of the world. New York, Routledge. French original: Piaget J. (1926) La représentation du monde chez l’enfant. F. Alcan, Paris.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Piaget J. (1976) Grasp of consciousness: Action and concept in the young child. Psychology Press, London. French original: Piaget J. (1974) La prise de conscience. PUF, Paris.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Piaget J. (1978) Success and understanding. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. French original: Piaget J. (1974) Réussir et comprendre. PUF, Paris.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Piaget J. (1998) Sobre pedagogia [On pedagogy]. Casa do Psicólogo, São Paulo. French original: Piaget J. (1998) De la pédagogie. Odile Jacob, Paris.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Riley E. (2015) What do people learn from using digital fabrication tools? In: Blikstein P., Martinez S. L. & Pang H. A. (eds.) Meaningful making: Projects and inspirations for fab labs and makerspaces. Constructing Modern Knowledge Press, Torrance CA: 8–13.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Valente J. A. (2005) A Espiral da Espiral de Aprendizagem: O processo de compreensão do papel das tecnologias de informação e comunicação na educação [Spiral of the Learning Spiral: The process of understanding the role of information and communication technologies in education]. Unpublished Thesis. Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.