Volume 14 · Number 3 · Pages 310–312
Reconceptualizing the Nature of Mathematical Expertise

Jérôme Proulx

Log in download the full text in PDF

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Open peer commentary on the article “Roles and Demands in Constructionist Teaching of Computational Thinking in University Mathematics” by Chantal Buteau, Ana Isabel Sacristán & Eric Muller. Abstract: I draw on Buteau, Sacristán and Muller’s article and Papert’s work to underline a possible reconceptualization of the notion of expertise in mathematics. This leads me, in turn, to reflect on the role and challenges for the mathematics teacher adopting these views.


Proulx J. (2019) Reconceptualizing the nature of mathematical expertise. Constructivist Foundations 14(3): 310–312. https://constructivist.info/14/3/310

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)


Borasi R. (1996) Reconceiving mathematics instruction: A focus on errors. Ablex, Norwood NJ. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Curcio F. R. & Artzt A. F. (2004) Reflecting on teaching mathematics through problem solving. In: Lester F. (ed.) Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Prekindergarten-grade 6. NCTM, Reston VA: 127–142. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hattie J. (2009) Visible learning. Routledge, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kahan J. A. & Wyberg T. R. (2004) Mathematics as sense making. In: Schoen H. & Charles R. I. (eds.) Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Grades 6–12. NCTM, Reston VA: 15–26. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lampert M. (1990) When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal 27: 29–63. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Papert S. (1972) Teaching children to be mathematicians versus teaching about mathematics. International Journal of Mathematics Education, Sciences and Technology 3: 249–262. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Papert S. (1980) Mindstorms. Basic Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Papert S. (1993) The children’s machine. Basic Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zack V. & Reid D. A. (2003) Good-enough understanding: Theorising about the learning of complex ideas. Part 1. For the Learning of Mathematics 23(3): 43–50. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.