Volume 14 · Number 3 · Pages 331–334
Keeping the Children as Question Marks: Educational Attempts to Tap Curiosity and the Drive for Challenge

Evgenia Sendova & Pavel Boytchev

Log in to download the full text for free

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Open peer commentary on the article “Problem Posing and Creativity in Elementary-School Mathematics” by E. Paul Goldenberg. Abstract: Supporting the inborn curiosity of children is the motivation for our involvement in developing novel curricula, textbooks and microworlds. Our main goal of implementing the constructionism as a fundamental educational strategy is to keep the students “as question marks,” i.e., to encourage them to pose questions, to make experiments, to invent their own problems. We strongly support the ideas behind Goldenberg’s experience in learning environments, generating curiosity and creative engagement (§15. As an extension of the ideas in §54 we propose a metaphor to visualize how programming can be “repurposed” to wrap the math in an attractive, yet educationally effective way.


Sendova E. & Boytchev P. (2019) Keeping the children as question marks: Educational attempts to tap curiosity and the drive for challenge. Constructivist Foundations 14(3): 331–334. https://constructivist.info/14/3/331

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)


Boytchev P. (2019) Developing educational content [in Bulgarian]. University Press “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Sofia (in press). ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Boytchev P., Chehlarova T. & Sendova E. (2007) Virtual reality vs real virtuality in mathematics teaching and learning. In: Proceedings of the Joint IFIP Conference Informatics, Mathematics, and ICT: A “golden triangle” (IMICT 2007), Boston, USA. CCIS, Northeastern University, Boston: 1. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brown S. I. & Walter M. (2005) The art of problem posing. Third edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Chehlarova T. & Sendova E. (2009) Enhancing the art of problem posing in a dynamic 3D computer environment. In: Proceedings of the 6th congress of the mathematicians of Republic of Macedonia, Struga 19–22 October 2008. Alfa 94 MA, Skopje: 19–28. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Feurzeig W. (1986) Algebra slaves and agents in a Logo-based mathematics curriculum. Instructional Science 14(3–4): 229–254. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Feynman R. (1999) The meaning of it all. Penguin, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gachev G., Sendova E., Nikolova I. (2005) The-more-it-changes-the-samer-it-gets principle in the context of mathematics and informatics education. In: Gregorczyk G., Walat A., Kranas W. & Borowiecki M. (eds.) Proceedings of EUROLOGO ’2005. DrukSfera, Warsaw: 87–99. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Postman N. & Weingartner C. (1969) Teaching as a subversive activity. Dell, New York ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sawyer W. W. (2003) Vision in elementary mathematics. Dover, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Thompson P. W. (1989) Artificial intelligence, advanced technology, and learning and teaching algebra. In: Kieran C. & Wagner S. (eds.) Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ: 135–161. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Toulmin S. (1977) Human understanding. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.