Volume 14 · Number 3 · Pages 357–359
Authors’ Response: Keeping the “Computation” in “Computational Thinking” Through Unplugged Activities

Tim Bell & Michael Lodi

Log in to download the full text for free

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Abstract: The commentaries provide useful questions and responses that help us understand better how unplugged activities serve as scaffolding to engage students in computer science. They help us to consider how activities relate to computational thinking, particularly by connecting the scaffolding in the activities to the limits of computation. This in turn helps us to navigate the somewhat disputed boundary between activities that clearly use computation as it occurs on physical devices, and metaphors that could potentially be misleading.


Bell T. & Lodi M. (2019) Authors’ response: Keeping the “computation” in “computational thinking” through unplugged activities. Constructivist Foundations 14(3): 357–359. https://constructivist.info/14/3/357

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)


Bell T., Tymann P. & Yehudai A. (2018) The big ideas in computer science for K-12 curricula. Bulletin of EATCS 124. http://bulletin.eatcs.org/index.php/beatcs/article/view/521
Denning P. J. (2017) Remaining trouble spots with computational thinking. Communications of the ACM 60(6): 33–39. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
diSessa A. A. (2018) Computational literacy and “the big picture” concerning computers in mathematics education. Mathematical thinking and learning 20(1): 3–31. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fincher S. A. & Robins A. V. (eds.) (2019) The Cambridge handbook of computing education research. Cambridge University Press. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nardelli E. (2019) Do we really need computational thinking? Communications of the ACM 62(2): 32–35. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vygotsky L. S. (1978) Mind in society. Edited by Michael Cole, Vera John-Steiner, Sylvia Scribner & Ellen Souberman. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. Russian original contributing sources written in the 1930s and onwards and published 1960 onwards. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Willingham D. T., Hughes E. M. & Dobolyi D. G. (2015) The scientific status of learning styles theories. Teaching of Psychology 42(3): 266–271. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wing J. (2011) Research notebook: Computational thinking – What and why? The Link: The Magazine of the Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science 6: 20–23. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/link/research-notebook-computational-thinking-what-and-why

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.