Pears A. (2019) Developing Computational Thinking, “Fad” or “Fundamental”?. Constructivist Foundations 14(3): 410–412

Volume 14 · Number 3 · Pages 410–412

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

Developing Computational Thinking, “Fad” or “Fundamental”?

Log in to download the full text for free

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Creativity in Solving Short Tasks for Learning Computational Thinking” by Valentina Dagienė, Gerald Futschek & Gabrielė Stupurienė. Abstract: Publicised by Wing and later expanded on, computational thinking purports to be the foundation of thought for coming generations, an indispensable skill-set that compulsory education must provide. The target article uses small tasks to develop skills relevant to computational science and computing, and explores the student interaction with these tasks. Useful skills may be developed by these students, but the article does not explicitly connect these tasks to computational thinking skills or competencies. This causes the reader to ask the question: are they developing computational thinking, or some other set of computer-related skills? A more fundamental question, and one beyond the scope of the target article, is what are the skills that are ultimately unique for computational thinking?

Citation

Pears A. (2019) Developing computational thinking, “fad” or “fundamental”? Constructivist Foundations 14(3): 410–412. https://constructivist.info/14/3/410

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Adams A. & Toromanoff D. (2016) Kitchen kinetics: Women’s movements in Sigrun Bülow-Hübe’s research. Resources for Feminist Research 34(3/4): 9–39. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Buckley J. (2018) Investigating the role of spatial ability as a factor of human intelligence in technology education: Towards a causal theory of the relationship between spatial ability and STEM education. Doctoral thesis, KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Stockholm, Sweden. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:Nbn:Se:Kth:Diva-228984

Clear T. (2015) Everybody must cut code! Educational imperative, fad or fantasy? ACM Inroads 6(4): 19–21. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Grier D. A. (2001) Human computers: The first pioneers of the information age. Endeavour 25(1): 28–32. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

O’Rourke K. H., Rahman A. S. & Taylor A. M. (2013) Luddites, the industrial revolution, and the demographic transition. Journal of Economic Growth 18(4): 373–409. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Robson E. & Stedall J. (2008) The Oxford handbook of the history of mathematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Sanford J. F. & Naidu J. T. (2016) Computational thinking concepts for grade school. Contemporary Issues in Education Research 9(1): 23–32. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Tedre M. (2014) The science of computing: Shaping a discipline. CRC Press, Boca Raton. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Wing J. M. (2006) Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM 49(3): 33–35. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Wing J. M. (2008) Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 366(1881): 3717–3725. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.