Volume 15 · Number 1 · Pages 43–44
Reflecting and Explicating Biases in Social Research Is not a Self-Serving Enterprise but Should Lead to Reliable Knowledge

Marie-Luisa Frick

Log in to download the full text for free

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Open peer commentary on the article “A Proposal for Personalised and Relational Qualitative Religious Studies Methodology” by Philip Baron. Abstract: Philip Baron’s proposals for personalized qualitative research, although not entirely novel, are worth considering. He fails, however, in clarifying their relation to the overall aims of scientific research.

Handling Editor: Alexander Riegler


Frick M.-L. (2019) Reflecting and explicating biases in social research is not a self-serving enterprise but should lead to reliable knowledge. Constructivist Foundations 15(1): 43–44. https://constructivist.info/15/1/043

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)


Husserl E. (2002) Zur Phänomenologischen Reduktion: Texte aus dem Nachlass (1926–1935) Edited by Sebastian Luft. Springer, Dordrecht. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
McCutcheon R. T. (2006) “It’s a lie. There’s no truth in it! It’s a sin!”: On the limits of the humanistic study of religion and the costs of saving others from themselves. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 74(3): 720–751. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Oris R. A. (2005) Between Heaven and Earth: The religious worlds people make and the scholars who study them. Princeton University Press, Princeton. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Roethlisberger F. J., Dickson W. J. & Wright, Harold A. (1939) Management and the worker: An account of a research program conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Weber M. (1973) Die “Objektivität” sozialwissenschaftlicher Erkenntnis und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. In: Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. J. C.B. Mohr, Tübingen. Originally published in 1904. English translation: Weber M. (2012) The “objectivity” of knowledge in social science and social policy. Chapter 3 in: Max Weber: Collected methodological writings. Edited by Hans Henrik Bruun and Sam Whimster. Routledge, London: 100–138 https://cepa.info/6141

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.