Problematizing: The Lived Journey of a Group of Students Doing Mathematics
Robyn Gandell & Jean-François Maheux
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Context: Mathematical problem solving is considered important in learning and teaching mathematics. In a recent study, Proulx and Maheux presented mathematical problem solving as a continuous dialectical process of small problem posing and solving instances in which the problem is continuously transformed, which they call problematizing. This problematizing conceptualization questions many current assumptions about students’ problem solving, for example, the use of heuristics and strategies. Problem: We address two aspects of this conceptualization: (a) how does problematizing evolve over time, and (b) how do the students’ problematizations interact? Method: In this study, we apply and further develop Proulx and Maheux’s enactivist perspective on problem solving. We answer our questions by applying micro-analysis to the mathematical problematizing of a group of students and, using Ingold’s pathways and meshwork as our framework, illustrate the lived practice of a group of students engaged in mathematical problem solving. Results: Our analysis illustrates how mathematical problematizing can be viewed as a complex, enmeshed and wayfaring journey, rather than a step-by-step process: in this enactive journey, smaller problems co-emerge from students’ interactions with one another and their environment. Implications: This research moves the focus on students’ mathematical problem solving to their actions, rather than strategies or direct links from problems to solutions, and provides a way to investigate, observe and value the lived practice of students’ mathematical problem solving. Constructivist content: Our work further strengthens the understanding of mathematical activities from an enactivist perspective where mathematical knowledge emerges from interaction between individual and environment.
Key words: Problem solving, problematizing, journey, heuristics, emergent, enactive, movement, rhythm, traces, artefacts.
Handling Editor: Alexander Riegler
Citation
Gandell R. & Maheux J.-F. (2019) Problematizing: The lived journey of a group of students doing mathematics. Constructivist Foundations 15(1): 50–60. https://constructivist.info/15/1/050
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Banting N. & Simmt E. (2017) Problem drift: Teaching curriculum with(in) a world of emerging significance. In: Galindo E. & Newton J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Hoosier Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators, Indianapolis IN: 693–700.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED581362.pdf
Barabé G. & Proulx J. (2015) Problem Posing: A review of sorts. In: Bartell T. G., Bieda K. N., Putnam R. T., Bradfield K. & Dominguez H. (eds.) Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Michigan State University, East Lansing MI : 1277–1284.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED584259.pdf
Bazzini L., Sabena C. & Villa B. (2009) Meaningful context in mathematical problem solving: A case study. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Science and Mathematics Education.Penang, Malaysia: CoSMEd.: 343–351.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Carlson M. P. & Bloom I. (2005) The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational studies in Mathematics 58(1): 45–75.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cobb P., Stephan M., McClain K. & Gravemeijer K. (2001) Participating in classroom mathematical practices. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 10(1&2): 113–163.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Duncker K. & Lees L. S. (1945) On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs 58(5): 1–113.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ellis A. B. (2014) What if we built learning trajectories for epistemic students? In: Hatfield L., Moor K. & Steffe L. (eds.) Epistemic algebraic students: Emerging models of students’ algebraic knowing. Volume 4: University of Wyoming, Laramie WY: 199–207.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Garofalo J. & Lester Jr. F. K. (1985) Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 16(3): 163–176.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Griffin C. C. & Jitendra A. K. (2009) Word problem-solving instruction in inclusive third-grade mathematics classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research 102(3): 187–202.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ingold T. (2009) Against space: Place, movement, knowledge. In: Kirby P. W. (ed.) Boundless worlds: An anthropological approach to movement. Berghahn Books, New York: 29–43.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lester F. K. & Kehle P. E. (2003) From problem solving to modeling: The evolution of thinking about research on complex mathematical activity. In: Lesh R. & Doerr H. M. (eds.) Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ: 501–518.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maheux J. F. & Proulx J. (2014) De la résolution de problème à problématiser mathématiquement: Vers une nouvelle approche de l’activité mathématique de l’élève. Education et Francophonie 42(2): 24–43.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Marshall S. P. (1995) Schemas in problem solving. Cambridge University Press, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mayer R. E. & Wittrock M. C. (2006) Problem solving. In: Alexander P. A & Winne P. H. (eds.) Handbook of Educational Psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ: 287–303.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Polya G. (1957) How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Proulx J. (2013) Mental mathematics, emergence of strategies, and the enactivist theory of cognition. Educational Studies in Mathematics 84(3): 309–328.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Radford L. (2003) Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs: A semiotic-cultural approach to students’ types of generalization. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 5(1): 37–70.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Radford L., Bardini C. & Sabena C. (2006) Rhythm and the grasping of the general. In: Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 4: 393–400.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Riley M. S., Greeno J. G. & Heller J. I. (1983) Development of children’s problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In: Ginsburg H. P. (ed.) The development of mathematical thinking. Academic Press, New York: 153–196.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Roth W. M. & Bautista A. (2012) The incarnate rhythm of geometrical knowing. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 31(1): 91–104.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Roth W. M. & Maheux J. F. (2015) The stakes of movement: A dynamic approach to mathematical thinking. Curriculum Inquiry 45(3): 266–284.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Santos-Trigo M. & Gooya Z. (2015) Mathematical problem solving. In: The proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Springer, Cham: 459–462.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schoenfeld A. H. (1992) Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making. In: Grouws E. (ed.) Handbook for research on mathematical teaching and learning. Macmillan, New York: 334–370.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Singer F. M., Ellerton N. & Cai J. (2013) Problem-posing research in mathematics education: New questions and directions. Educational Studies in Mathematics 83(1): 1–7.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Treffinger D. J. (1995) Creative problem solving: Overview and educational implications. Educational Psychology Review 7(3): 301–312.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Turner E., Gutiérrez R. J. & Sutton T. (2011) Student participation in collective problem solving in an after-school mathematics club: Connections to learning and identity. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 11(3): 226–246.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zack V. & Reid D. A. (2003) Good-enough understanding: Theorising about the learning of complex ideas (Part 1) For the Learning of Mathematics 23(3): 43–50.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.
