Volume 15 · Number 1 · Pages 65–67
Living with Lived Journeys: Ethical Considerations of Teaching Mathematics

Nat Banting

Download the full text in
PDF (107 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Problematizing: The Lived Journey of a Group of Students Doing Mathematics” by Robyn Gandell & Jean-François Maheux. Abstract: The aim of this commentary is to add to the conceptualization of problematizing by prompting a consideration of the teacher-observer as a wholly complicit, ethical participant in the mathematical journeys of their students.

Handling Editor: Alexander Riegler

Citation

Banting N. (2019) Living with lived journeys: Ethical considerations of teaching mathematics. Constructivist Foundations 15(1): 65–67. https://constructivist.info/15/1/065

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Banting N. & Simmt E. (2017) From (observing) problem solving to (observing) problem posing: Fronting the teacher as observer. Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 177–179 https://constructivist.info/13/1/177
Banting N. & Simmt E. (2017) Problem drift: Teaching curriculum with (in) a world of emerging significance. In: Galindo E. & Newton J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Hoosier Association of Mathematica Teacher Educators, Indianapolis IN: 693–700. http://files.eric.gov/fulltext/ED581362.pdf
Banting N. (2017) Carving curriculum out of chaos: Exploring teacher interventions and the patterning of small groups in mathematics class. Master’s thesis. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Banting N. (2017) What problem are they posing? Viewing group problem solving through an enactivist lens. Delta-K 54(1): 11–15. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brown L. & Coles A. (2012) Developing “deliberate analysis” for learning mathematics and for mathematics teacher education: How the enactive approach to cognition frames reflection. Educational Studies in Mathematics 80(1–2): 217–231. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Davis B. (1995) Why teach mathematics? Mathematics education and enactivist theory. For the Learning of Mathematics 15(2): 2–9 https://cepa.info/4323
Kieren T. & Simmt E. (2009) Brought forth in bringing forth: The inter-actions and products of a collective learning system. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education 6(2): 20–28. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Reidel, Boston. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Proulx J. & Maheux J. F. (2017) From problem-solving to problem-posing, and from strategies to laying down a path in solving: Taking on Varela’s ideas for mathematics education research. Constructivist Foundations 13(1): 160–167 https://constructivist.info/13/1/160
Proulx J. & Simmt E. (2016) Distinguishing enactivism from constructivism: Engaging with new possibilities. In: Csíkos C., Rausch A. & Szitányi J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 4. PME, Szeged, Hungary: 99–106. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Simmt E. (2000) Mathematics knowing in action: A fully embodied interpretation. PhD dissertation. University of Alberta, Edmonton. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1987) Laying down a path in walking. In: Thompson W. I. (ed.) Gaia: A way of knowing. Political implications of the new biology. Lindisfarne Press, New York: 48–64 https://cepa.info/2069
Varela F. J. (1999) Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford University Press, Stanford https://cepa.info/2119
Varela F. J., Thompson E. & Rosch E. (1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.