In Defense of Biosemiotics
Peter Cariani
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Open peer commentary on the article “A Critique of Barbieri’s Code Biology” by Alexander V. Kravchenko. Abstract: My commentary criticizes Kravchenko’s objections to Barbieri’s biosemiotic theory. Because Kravchenko holds that concepts of signs, codes, and languages should be applied only to humans, his position, which is neither clearly explained nor defended, completely rules out any semiotics that would apply to biological construction in organisms (genetic codes and their expression), intra-organismic communication processes (molecular signals and their interpretations), informational processes in nervous systems (neural codes and how they are read out), and animal communication. I argue that most of the critique is about unproductive disagreements over word usages rather than an attempt to develop an alternative biosemiotics. Kravchenko’s critique also misconstrues how biosemioticians think about signs, codes, interpretation, meaning, and epistemology.
Handling Editor: Alexander Riegler
Citation
Cariani P. (2020) In defense of biosemiotics. Constructivist Foundations 15(2): 155–158. https://constructivist.info/15/2/155
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
References
Barbieri M. (2008) Is the cell a semiotic system? In: Barbieri M. (ed.) Introduction to biosemiotics. Springer, Dordrecht: 179–207.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Cariani P. (2015) Sign functions in natural and artificial systems. In: Trifonas P. P. (ed.) International handbook of semiotics. Springer, Dordrecht: 917–950
https://cepa.info/4142
Cariani P. (2019) Musical intervals, scales and tunings: Auditory representations and neural codes. In: Rentfrow P. J. & Levitin D. J. (eds.) Foundations in music psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 149–218.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
de Waal F. B. M. (2017) Are we smart enough to know how smart animals are? W. W. Norton, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (2007) Aspects of constructivism. Vico, Berkeley, Piaget. In: Larochelle M. (ed.) Key works in radical constructivism. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam: 91–99.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Griffin D. R. (1992) Animal minds. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pepperberg I. M. (1999) The Alex studies: Cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pilley J. W. & Hinzmann H. (2014) Chaser: Unlocking the genius of the dog who knows a thousand words. Thorndike Press, Waterville MN.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rączaszek-Leonardi J. (2012) Language as a system of replicable constraints. In: Pattee H. H. & J. Rączaszek-Leonardi (eds.) Laws, language and life: Howard Pattee’s classic papers on the physics of symbols with contemporary commentary. Springer, Dordrecht: 295–333.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Reid R. G. B. (2007) Biological emergences: Evolution by natural experiment. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sherman J. (2017) Neither ghost nor machine: The emergence and nature of selves. Columbia University Press, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.
