Volume 15 · Number 2 · Pages 175–177
That Which Must not, Can not Be

Michael Schorner

Log in to download the full text for free

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Open peer commentary on the article “Why Josef Mitterer’s Non-Dualism Is Inconsistent” by Stefan Weber. Abstract: I show that the issues raised in Weber’s target article are based on an inaccurate account of the history of philosophy and a questionable interpretation of non-dualism.

Handling Editor: Alexander Riegler


Schorner M. (2020) That which must not, can not be. Constructivist Foundations 15(2): 175–177. https://constructivist.info/15/2/175

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)


Brentano F. (1930) Wahrheit und Evidenz. Meiner, Leipzig. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mitterer J. (2011) Das Jenseits der Philosophie. Wider das dualistische Erkenntnisprinzip [The beyond of philosophy: Against the dualistic principle of cognition]. Reprint of the original edition from 1992 with a new afterword. Velbrück Wissenschaft, Weilerswist. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mitterer J. (2011) Die Flucht aus der Beliebigkeit [The flight from contingency]. Reprint of the original edition from 2001 with a new foreword. Velbrück Wissenschaft, Weilerswist. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Weber S. (2005) Non-dualistische Medientheorie: Eine philosophische Grundlegung [Non-dualistic media theory: A philosophical foundation]. UVK Verlagsgesellschaft, Konstanz. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Weber S. (2010) Der Non-Dualismus Josef Mitterers – Versuch einer Rekonstruktion [Josef Mitterer’s non-dualism – an attempted reconstruction]. In: Riegler A. & Weber S. (ed.) Die Dritte Philosophie: Kritische Beiträge zu Josef Mitterers Non-Dualismus. Velbrück, Weilerswist: 15–32. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.