Log in to download the full text for free
Open peer commentary on the article “Why Josef Mitterer’s Non-Dualism Is Inconsistent” by Stefan Weber. Abstract: Weber reads Mitterer’s non-dualism as a variant of linguistic idealism. This means confusing non-dualism with an ontological theory. The consequence of this interpretation is his critique that non-dualism is inconsistent. In my commentary I claim that as soon as the initial confusion is cleared up, Weber’s critique collapses.
Handling Editor: Alexander Riegler
Neges K. (2020) A confusion with consequences. Constructivist Foundations 15(2): 178–180. https://constructivist.info/15/2/178
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.