Volume 15 · Number 3 · Pages 213–216
In Favor of Impropriety

Vicente Raja & Anthony P. Chemero

Download the full text in
PDF (125 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Précis of The Philosophy of Affordances” by Manuel Heras-Escribano. Abstract: Heras-Escribano argues against the normative character of affordances from a framework that relies on (a) a Wittgensteinian notion of normativity and (b) the incompatibility of direct perception, as it is described in ecological psychology, and perceptual error. We argue against this position and provide a pluralistic notion of normativity that is able to accommodate the normative character of affordances.

Handling Editor: Alexander Riegler

Citation

Raja V. & Chemero A. P. (2020) In favor of impropriety. Constructivist Foundations 15(3): 213–216. https://constructivist.info/15/3/213

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Chemero A. (2009) Radical embodied cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dreyfus H. L. & Kelly S. (2007) Heterophenomenology: Heavy-handed sleight-of-hand. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6: 45–55. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fajen B. R. (2007) Affordance-based control of visually guided action. Ecological Psychology 19(4): 383–410 https://cepa.info/6415
Gibson J. J. (1960) The concept of stimulus in psychology. American Psychologist 15(11): 694–703. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Heras-Escribano M. & de Pinedo M. (2016) Are affordances normative? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15(4): 565–589 https://cepa.info/6552
Heras-Escribano M. (2019) The philosophy of affordances. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hutto D. D. & Myin E. (2013) Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. Reviewed in https://constructivist.info/8/3/362
Hutto D. D. & Myin E. (2017) Evolving enactivism: Basic minds meet content. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kelso J. A. S. & Engstrøm D. A. (2006) The complementary nature. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Michaels C. F. & Carello C. (1981) Direct perception. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Myin E. (2016) Perception as something we do. Journal of Consciousness Studies 23(5–6): 80–104. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Raja V. (2019) From metaphor to theory: The role of resonance in perceptual learning. Adaptive Behavior 27(6): 405–421. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Raja V. (2020) Resonance and radical embodiment. Synthese Online first. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229–020–02610–6
Reed E. S. (1996) Encountering the world: Toward an ecological psychology. Oxford University Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Segundo-Ortín M., Heras-Escribano M. & Raja V. (2019) Ecological psychology is radical enough: A reply to radical enactivists. Philosophical Psychology 32(7): 1001–1023 https://cepa.info/6418

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.