Log in download the full text in PDF
Open peer commentary on the article “Précis of The Philosophy of Affordances” by Manuel Heras-Escribano. Abstract: I question the notion that we need to understand affordances in terms of Rylean non-factualist dispositions. This is not because I disagree with Herlas-Escribano’s analysis; on the contrary, I consider it illuminating and essential. Rather, his analysis shows that affordances can be understood as originally defined by Gibson and elaborated by Stoffregen (i.e., as a particular kind of non-reductionist, non-physicalist relation between organism and environment. Translation into Rylean dispositions is therefore unnecessary.
Handling Editor: Alexander Riegler
Barrett L. (2020) What’s wrong with affordances? Constructivist Foundations 15(3): 229–230. https://constructivist.info/15/3/229
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.