Volume 15 · Number 3 · Pages 238–250
Visual Representation in the Wild: Empirical Phenomenological Investigation of Visual-spatial Working Memory in a Naturalistic Setting

Aleš Oblak

Log in download the full text in PDF

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Context: In sciences of the mind, cognitive phenomena are typically investigated with the use of psychological tasks. These usually represent highly constrained environments that isolate and make phenomena under investigation measurable. However, it is poorly understood how psychological tasks constrain one’s cognition and, to a certain extent, construct their own object of inquiry. Problem: I address the question of how visual-spatial working memory is constrained differently in a naturalistic setting, as compared to when measured with psychological tasks. Specifically, can we observe principled and empirical support for the claim that psychological tasks to a certain extent construct the phenomena they purportedly measure? Method: I employ an empirical phenomenological approach that combines the methodological and analytical framework of constructivist grounded theory with contemporary approaches to the scientific study of experience, to gather phenomenal data on visual working memory in a naturalistic setting - a drawing task. Results: The drawing task elicits visual-spatial working memory as a type of visual-motor behavior with rare instances of mnemonic representations taking the form of language. Importantly, my empirical findings show that investigating cognitive phenomena in naturalistic settings yields constructs that are different from phenomena elicited in a laboratory setting. Implications: The findings suggest that investigating the mind solely with psychological tasks provides an incomplete picture of the phenomena under investigation. Constructivist content: I outline empirical data that points to how, under different constraints from the environment, not only do we conceptualize cognitive phenomena according to different theoretical constructs, but our cognitive system deploys different strategies to solve the task at hand. Keywords: Psychological task, visual-spatial working memory, empirical phenomenology, naturalistic task, drawing task.

Handling Editor: Alexander Riegler

Citation

Oblak A. (2020) Visual representation in the wild: Empirical phenomenological investigation of visual-spatial working memory in a naturalistic setting. Constructivist Foundations 15(3): 238–250. https://constructivist.info/15/3/238

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Albertazzi L. (2019) Experimental phenomenology: What it is and what it is not. Synthese, online first. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229–019–02209–6
Allen-Collinson J. & Hockey J. (2010) Feeling the way: Notes toward a haptic phenomenology of distance running and scuba diving. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 46(3): 330–345. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Allen-Collinson J. & Hockey J. (2015) From a certain point of view: Sensory phenomenological envisionings of running space and place. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 44(1): 63–83. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Anderson M. L. (2014) After phrenology: Neural reuse and the interactive brain. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Baddeley A. D. & Hitch G. (1974) Working memory. In: Bower G. H. (ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. Academic Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bainbridge W. A., Hall E. H. & Baker C. I. (2019) Drawings of real-world scenes during free recall reveal detailed object and spatial information in memory. Nature Communications 10(5): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467–018–07830–6
Braun V. & Clarke V. (2012) Thematic analysis. In: Cooper H. (ed.) APA handbook of research methods in psychology. Volume 2: Research designs. American Psychological Association, Washington DC. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Camerer C. & Mobbs D. (2017) Differences in behavior and brain activity during hypothetical and real choices. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 21(1): 46–56. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Charmaz K. (2004) Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Conway A. R. A., Kane M. J., Bunting M. F., Hambrick D. Z., Wilhelm O. & Engle R. W. (2005) Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12(5): 769–786. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Donders F. C. (1969) On the speed of mental processes. Acta Psychologica 30(1): 412–431. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dunbar K. (2011) The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings, yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. In: Gentner D., Holyoak K. J. & Kokinov B. K. (eds.) The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 313–334. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dutta A., Shah K., Silvanto J. & Soto D. (2014) Neural basis of non-conscious visual working memory. Neuroimage 91(1): 336–343. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Eilan N. (1998) Perceptual intentionality, attention and consciousness. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 43(1): 181–202. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Eriksson J., Vogel E. K., Lansner A., Bergström F. & Nyberg L. (2015) Neurocognitive architecture of working memory. Neuron 88(1): 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.020
Fernyhough C., Alderson-Day B., Hurlburt R. T. & Kühn S. (2018) Investigating multiple streams of consciousness: Using descriptive experience sampling to explore internally and externally directed streams of thought. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12: 494. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00494
Flick U. (2009) An introduction to qualitative research. Sage, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Froese T. & Fuchs T. (2012) The extended body: A case study in the neurophenomenology of social interaction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11(1): 205–235 https://cepa.info/2389
Fusch P. I. & Ness L. R. (2015) Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report 20(9): 1408–1416. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gallagher S. (2017) Enactivist interventions: Rethinking the mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gazzaley A. & Nobre A. C. (2012) Top-down modulation: Bridging selective attention and working memory. Trends in Cognitive Science 16(2): 129–135. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hart J. T. (1965) Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology 56(4): 208–216. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hurlburt R. T. & Akhter S. A. (2006) The descriptive experience sampling method. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5(3–4): 271–301. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hurlburt R. T. (2011) Investigating pristine inner experience: Moments of truth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hurlburt R. T., Alderson-Day B, Fernyhough C. & Kühn S. (2017) Can inner experience be apprehended in high fidelity? Examining brain activation and experience from multiple perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology 8: 43. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00043
Hurlburt R. T., Alderson-Day B., Kühn S. & Fernyhough C. (2016) Exploring the ecological validity of thinking on demand: Neural correlates of elicited vs. spontaneously occurring inner speech. PLoS ONE 11(2): e0147932. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147932
Hutto D. D. & Myin E. (2012) Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Johansson P., Hall L., Gulz A., Haake M. & Watanabe K. (2007) Choice blindness and trust in the virtual world. 電子情報通信学会技術研究報告107(60): 83–86. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Johansson P., Hall L., Sikström S. & Olsson A. (2005) Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. Science 310(5745): 116–119. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kane M. J. & Engle R. W. (2002) The role of the prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive function, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-difference perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9(4): 637–671. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03196323
Kerr C., Nixon A. & Wild D. (2010) Assessing and demonstrating data saturation in qualitative inquiry supporting patient-reported outcomes research. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 10(3): 269–281. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Klein G. & Wright C. (2016) Macrocognition: From theory to toolbox. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 54. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00054
Klein G. A., Calderwood R. & Clinton-Cirocco A. (1986) Rapid decision making on the fire ground. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 30(6): 576–580. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kordeš U. & Demšar E. (2018) Excavating belief about past experience: Experiential dynamics of the reflective act. Constructivist Foundations 13(2): 219–229 https://constructivist.info/13/2/219
Kordeš U. & Klauser F. (2016) Second-person in-depth phenomenological inquiry as an approach for studying enaction of beliefs. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 14(4): 369–377 https://cepa.info/4334
Kordeš U. (2016) Going beyond theory: Constructivism and empirical phenomenology. Constructivist Foundations 11(2): 375–385 https://constructivist.info/11/2/375
Kordeš U. (2019) Horizons of analysis. Constructivist Foundations 14(2): 149–152 https://constructivist.info/14/2/149
Kordeš U., Oblak A., Smrdu M. & Demšar E. (2019) Ethnography of meditation: An account of pursuing meditative practice as a tool for researching consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 27(7–8): 184–237. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lah A. & Kordeš U. (2014) One cannot “just ask” about experience. In: Markič O., Strle T., Kordeš U. & Gams M. (eds.) Kognitivna znanost/Cognitive Sciences. In: Proceedings of the 17th international multiconference “Information Society – IS 2014.” Volume C. Inštitut Jožef Štefan, Ljubljana: 36–39 https://cepa.info/2370
Lipič V. & Kordeš U. (2017) What dwells on fringes of awareness. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 15(1): 251–259. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/282561
Luck S. J. & Vogel E. K. (2013) Visual working memory capacity: From psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends in Cognitive Science 17(8): 391–400. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lutz A., Lachaux J., Martinerie J. & Varela F. J. (2002) Guiding the study of brain dynamics by using first-person data: Synchrony patterns correlate with ongoing conscious states during a simple visual task. PNAS 99(3): 1586–1591 https://cepa.info/2092
Mcintyre R. (1999) Naturalizing phenomenology: Dretske on qualia. In: Petitot J., F. J., Pachoud B. & Roy J. (ed.) Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science. Stanford University Press, Stanford: 429–439. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Morley J. (2010) It’s always about the epoché. Les Collectifs du Cirp 1(1): 223–232. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Morrison H., McBriar S., Powell H., Proudfoot J., Stanley S., Fitzgerald D. & Callard F. (2019) What is a psychological task? The operational pliability of “task” in psychological laboratory experimentation. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 5(1): 61–85. https://www.estsjournal.org/index.php/ests/article/view/274/169
Nelson J. (2017) Using conceptual depth criteria: Addressing the challenge of reaching saturation in qualitative research. Qualitative Research 17(5): 554–570. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nicolaides K. (1969) The natural way to draw. Houghton Mifflin, Boston. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Overgaard M. S. & Mogensen J. (2017) An integrative view on consciousness and introspection. Review of Philosophical Psychology 8: 129–141. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
O’Reilly M. & Parker N. (2013) “Unsatisfactory saturation”: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research 13(2): 190–197. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Perdreau F. & Cavanagh P. (2015) Drawing experts have better visual memory while drawing. Journal of Vision 15(5): 1–10. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Petitmengin C., Remillieux A. & Valenzuela-Moguillansky C. (2018) Discovering the structures of lived experience: Towards a micro-phenomenological analysis method. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18(4): 691–730 https://cepa.info/5743
Petitmengin C., van Beek M., Bitbol M., Nissou J. & Roepstroff A. (2017) What is it like to meditate? Methods and issues for a microphenomenological description of meditative experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 23(5–6): 170–198. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Prosen T., Regent D. & Bergant N. (2016) Poletna šola fenomenologije in filozofije duha v Kopenhagnu 2016 [Summer School of Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind in Copenhagen 2016]. Phainomena 25(96–97): 251–263. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sartre J. (2010) The imaginary: A phenomenological psychology of the imagination. Routledge, New York. French original published in 1940. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Slana Ozimič A. & Repovš G. (2020) Visual working memory capacity is limited by two systems that change across lifespan. Journal of Memory and Language 112(1): 104090. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X20300048
Soto D. & Silvanto J. (2016) Is conscious awareness needed for all working memory processes? Neuroscience of Consciousness 2016(1): niw009. https://academic.oup.com/nc/article/2016/1/niw009/2757129
Soto D., Mäntylä T. & Silvanto J. (2011) Working memory without consciousness. Current Biology 21(22): R912–R913. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982211010888
Strle T. (2016) Embodied, enacted and experienced decision-making. Phainomena XXV(98–99): 83–107. https://cepa.info/4038
Valenzuela-Moguillansky C. & Vásquez-Rosati A. (2019) An analysis procedure for the micro-phenomenological interview. Constructivist Foundations 14(2): 123–145 https://constructivist.info/14/2/123
van Ede F., Chekroud S. R. & Nobre A. C. (2019) Human gaze tracks attentional focusing in memorized visual space. Nature Human Behavior 3(5): 462–470. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6546593/
Wilhelm O., Hildenbrandt A. & Oberauer K. (2013) What is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it? Frontiers in Psychology 4: 433. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00433/full
Wynn J. S., Ryan J. D. & Buchsbaum B. R. (2020) Eye movements support behavioral pattern completion. PNAS 117(11): 6246–6254. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zahavi D. (2019) Applied phenomenology: Why is it safe to ignore the epoché. Continental Philosophy Review, online first. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11007–019–09463-y

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.