Abstract
Open peer commentary on the article “Constructivism, Fast Thinking, Heuristics and Sustainable Development” by Hugh Gash. Abstract: I argue that a radical constructivist approach might focus on providing us with what I call “tamed heuristics.” This would make our fast and intuitive evaluation more reliable in that it leads to more viable outcomes. I also consider the question of why this should be an interesting enterprise when we also could try to get rid of heuristics as far as possible and replace them with instances of thoroughly, careful slow thinking, instead.
Handling Editor: Alexander Riegler
Citation
Kletzl S. (2020) Tamed heuristics. Constructivist Foundations 16(1): 021–022. https://constructivist.info/16/1/021
Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)
References
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.