Imoto S. (2020) What Is It to Live Counterfactuals?. Constructivist Foundations 16(1): 094–096

Volume 16 · Number 1 · Pages 094–096

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

What Is It to Live Counterfactuals?

Log in to download the full text for free

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Construction of Irreality: An Enactive-Constructivist Stance on Counterfactuals” by Andrey S. Druzhinin. Abstract: Schopenhauer and the two linguists, Tokieda and Miura, are indispensable figures to elucidate the logic of construction of our counterfactual experiences. In addition to the conditional and the subjunctive moods, the imperative could be regarded as a form of counterfactual experiences. According to Schopenhauer, these experiences belong mainly to the class of willing or acts of will.

Handling Editor: Alexander Riegler

Citation

Imoto S. (2020) What is it to live counterfactuals? Constructivist Foundations 16(1): 094–096. https://constructivist.info/16/1/094

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Imoto S. (2011) The logic of Maturana’s biology. Constructivist Foundations 6(3): 325–333. Fulltext at. https://constructivist.info/6/3/325

Imoto S. (2012) Cognitive dynamics in the Japanese language: Language process theory of Tokieda and Miura. In: Kravchenko A. (ed.) Cognitive dynamics in linguistic interactions. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne: 64–80. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Imoto S. (2013) Что такое “языковая деятельность”, по У. Матуране? [What is “language activity” according to H. Maturana?] Translated by A. V. Kravchenko. In: Kravchenko A. V. & Vinogradov V. A. (eds.) Studia linguistica cognitiva, Volume 3: Когнитивная динамика в языковых взаимодействиях. Флинта, Moscow: 19–40. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Imoto S. (2015) Find the word! – but where? Maturana’s “coordination” and Sartre’s “reflection” around naming. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1814. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Miura T. (1967) 認識と言語の理論 [Theory of cognition and language]. Parts I and II. Keiso Shobo, Tokyo. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Miura T. (1972) 認識と言語の理論 [Theory of cognition and language]. Part III. Keiso Shobo, Tokyo. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Miura T. (1976) 日本語はどういう言語か [What language is Japanese?]. Revised version. Kodansha, Tokyo. Originally published in 1956. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Schopenhauer A. (1997) On the fourfold root of the principle of sufficient reason: A philosophical essay. In: White F. C., Schopenhauer’s early fourfold root. Translation and commentary. Avebury, Brookfield VT : 1–70. German original published as: Schopenhauer A. (1813) Ueber die vierfache Wurzel des Satzes vom zureichenden Grunde: Eine philosophische Abhandlung. Hof Buch- und Kunst-Handlung, Rudolstadt. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Tokieda M. (1941) 国語学原論：言語過程説の成立と展開 [Principles of the Japanese language: Establishment and development of language process theory], Part I. Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Tokieda M. (1955) 国語学原論：言語過程説の成立と展開 [Principles of the Japanese language: Establishment and development of language process theory], Part II. Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.