Volume 16 · Number 1 · Pages 129–132
Towards an Official Computational Thinking Education in Regular School Settings. Review of Computational Thinking Education, edited by Siu-Cheung Kong and Harold Abelson.

Samet Okumus

Log in download the full text in PDF

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Abstract: The book provides a deep account of the use of computational thinking (CT) skills in education, with a focus on individual, social and cultural elements, and dives into issues foregrounding CT skills. Although the chapters of the book provide important educational and practical implications for the reader, methodological choices and the lack of theoretical connections of CT concepts curtail the use of CT skills in education, from a constructionist view.

Handling Editor: Alexander Riegler

Citation

Okumus S. (2020) Towards an official computational thinking education in regular school settings. Review of computational thinking education, edited by siu-cheung kong and harold abelson.. Constructivist Foundations 16(1): 129–132. https://constructivist.info/16/1/129

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Brennan K. (2015) Beyond technocentrism: Supporting constructionism in the classroom. Constructivist Foundations 10(3): 289–296. https://constructivist.info/10/3/289
Confrey J. & Kazak S. (2006) A thirty-year reflection on constructivism in mathematics education in PME. In: Gutiérrez A. & Boero P. (eds.) Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam: 305–345. https://cepa.info/2973
Dagienė V. & Futschek G. (2019) On the way to constructionist learning of computational thinking in regular school settings. Constructivist Foundations 14(3): 231–233. https://constructivist.info/14/3/231
Healy L. & Kynigos C. (2010) Charting the microworld territory over time: Design and construction in mathematics education. ZDM 42(1): 63–76. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kafai Y. B. & Burke Q. (2015) Constructionist gaming: Understanding the benefits of making games for learning. Educational Psychologist 50(4): 313–334. https://cepa.info/6655
Kynigos C. (2007) Using half-baked microworlds to challenge teacher educators’ knowing. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 12(2): 87–111. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kynigos C. (2015) Designing constructionist e-books: New mediations for creative mathematical thinking? Constructivist Foundations 10(3): 305–320. https://constructivist.info/10/3/305
Noss R. & Clayson J. (2015) Reconstructing constructionism. Constructivist Foundations 10(3): 285–288. http://constructivist.info/10/3/285
Noss R. & Hoyles C. (1996) Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning cultures and computers. Springer, Dordrecht. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Noss R. & Hoyles C. (2017) Constructionism and microworlds. In: Duval E., Sharples M. & Sutherland R. (eds.) Technology enhanced learning research themes. Springer, Cham: 29–35. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ozmantar M. F. & Monaghan J. (2008) Are mathematical abstractions situated? In: Watson A. & Winbourne P. (eds.) New directions for situated cognition in mathematics education. Springer, New York: 103–127. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Papert S. (1980) Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Passey D. (2017) Computer science (CS) in the compulsory education curriculum: Implications for future research. Education and Information Technologies 22(2): 421–443. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stein M. K., Grover B. W. & Henningsen M. (1996) Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal 33(2): 455–488. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tudge J. & Rogoff B. (1989) Peer influences on cognitive development: Piagetian and Vygotskian perspectives. In: Bornstein M. & Bruner J. (eds.) Interaction in human development. Erlbaum, Hillsdale: 17–25. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wing J. M. (2006) Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM 49(3): 33–35. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.