Volume 16 · Number 3 · Pages 327–338
Materialism and Selection Bias: Political Psychology from a Radical Constructivist Perspective

Björn Goldstein

Log in download the full text in PDF

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Context: Political psychology rests on the assumption of the existence of a world outside and independent of consciousness. This ontological materialism is hardly spoken of within the field, as it is an unchallenged assumption among most psychologists and social scientists, including political scientists. However, the materialist paradigm frames research designs, the interpretation of data and theory building. Also, there is a bias towards psychological universals - the claim that all individual and group psychologies are equal (as compared to cultural psychology, which is critical about universalist claims), which can be understood as a consequence of the discipline’s hidden ontological core assumption. Problem: The purpose of this article is to show how the choice of a certain approach to answer a research question rests on the deeply ingrained beliefs of researchers. These beliefs are usually not part of research presentations even though they have tremendous influence on the results of the whole research process. Recipients use these necessarily biased research results as building blocks for the construction of their own realities. Method: The article is an ex-post interpretative summary of my considerations during the designing period of an earlier study in which I researched, from the perspective of political psychology, on what grounds South Indian politicians have positive, negative and ambiguous attitudes towards the “West.” Using this research project as an example, this article is a critical discussion and analysis of the ideological backdrop of political psychology, in particular the belief in a materialist ontology. Results: I argue that, instead of coming closer to any kind of an “objective” understanding of political attitudes, in political psychology we cannot help but invent new stories about the (political) world as long as our beliefs consciously or unconsciously influence our decision making in theorizing and research practice. Implications: The discussion shows exemplarily how in political psychology a researcher’s basic assumption that a physical world outside of consciousness exists determines methodology and justifies a particular set of interpretations. The unproblematized physicalist paradigm makes a researcher in political psychology necessarily a biased researcher. Constructivist content: The article is a description of how a researcher’s subjective perception and construction of the (social) world has consequences for the complete research process. Political psychology is based on the highly problematic assumption of an ontic world that exists independently of a subjective observer. It can serve as a telling example of how the preoccupation with a physicalist world explanation can lead to methodological and interpretative biases.

Key words: Cultural psychology, emotional beliefs, identity, metaphysical idealism, ontological materialism, political psychology, psychological universals, research biases, social constructivism.


Goldstein B. (2021) Materialism and selection bias: Political psychology from a radical constructivist perspective. Constructivist Foundations 16(3): 327–338. https://constructivist.info/16/3/327

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Bettoni M. C. & Eggs C. (2010) User-Centred Knowledge Management: A Constructivist and Socialized View
Troadec B. (2007) Constructivism, Culture, and Cognitive Development: What Kind of Schemes for a Cultural Psychologist?
Gash H. (2020) Constructivism, Fast Thinking, Heuristics and Sustainable Development
Derra A. (2008) The Non-dualizing Way of Speaking and the Female Subjectivity Problem
Goldstein B. (2021) Author’s Response: Humble Research and the Inescapability of Limited Knowledge


Adorno T. W. (2005) Minima moralia: Reflections from damaged life. Verso, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Alford J. R., Funk C. L. & Hibbing J. R. (2005) Are political orientations genetically transmitted? The American Political Science Review 99(2): 153–167. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=poliscifacpub
Althusser L. (1995) Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (Notes towards an investigation) In: Žižek S. (ed.) Mapping ideology. Verso, London: 100–140. Originally published in 1970. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Asch S. E. (1955) Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American 193(5): 31–35. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Burnham P., Lutz K. G., Grant W. & Layton-Henry Z. (2004) Research methods in politics (political analysis) Palgrave Macmillan, Houndsmill. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Chomsky N. (2002) Syntactic structures. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Damasio A. R. (1994) Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. Avon Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Damasio A. R. (1999) The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Harcourt Brace, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Eichinger Ferro-Luzzi G. (1992) If Whorf had known Tiruvalluvar? Universalism and cultural relativism in a famous work of ancient Tamil literature. Anthropos 87(4/6): 391–406. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (1991) Through the eyes of the other. In: Steier F. (ed.) Research and reflexivity. Sage Publications, London: 63–75. https://cepa.info/1729
Gassmann R. & Behr W. (2005) Antikchinesisch: Ein Lehrbuch in drei Teilen. Teil 1: Eine propädeutische Einführung in fünf Element(ar)gängen [Ancient Chinese: A textbook in three parts. Part 1: A propaedeutic introduction in five element(ary) courses]. Second edition. Peter Lang, Bern. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gat A. (2008) War in human civilization. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gjerde P. F. & Onishi M. (2000) Selves, cultures, and nations: The psychological representation of “The Japanese” in the era of globalization. Human Development 43(4–5): 216–226. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gjerde P. F. (2004) Culture, power, and experience: Toward a person-centered cultural psychology. Human Development 47(3): 138–157. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press, London. https://cepa.info/1462
Goldstein B. (2015) Emanzipation und “höheres Chinesentum”: Was ist kritisch an der kritischen Normenforschung in den Internationalen Beziehungen? [Emancipation and “higher Chinesedom”: What is critical about the critical norm research in International Relations?] Zeitschrift für Politik 62(2): 140–158. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Goldstein B. (2018) The political psychology of attitudes towards the West: An empirical analysis from Tamil Nadu. Routledge, Abingdon. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Harper L. V. (2005) Epigenetic inheritance and the intergenerational transfer of experience. Psychological Bulletin 131(3): 340–360. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Henrich J., Heine S. & Norenzayan A. (2010) The WEIRDest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(2–3): 61–135. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hobson J. M. (2012) The Eurocentric conception of world politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Horkheimer M. & Adorno T. W. (2003) Dialektik der Aufklärung: Philosophische Fragmente [Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments]. In: Schmidt A. (ed.) Max Horkheimer: Gesammelte Schriften 5. Fischer, Frankfurt a. M.: 13–290. Originally published in 1944. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Horkheimer M. (1988) Egoismus und Freiheitsbewegung: Zur Anthropologie des bürgerlichen Zeitalters [Egoism and freedom movement: On the anthropology of the bourgeois age]. In: Schmidt A. (ed.) Max Horkheimer: Gesammelte Schriften, 4. Fischer, Frankfurt a. M.: 9–88. Originally published in 1936. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kastrup B. (2015) Brief peeks beyond: Critical essays on metaphysics, neuroscience, free will, skepticism and culture. John Hunt Publishing, Hampshire. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Krosnick J. A., Chiang I. A. & Stark T. H. (2017) The two core goals of political psychology. In: Krosnick J. A., Chiang I. A. & Stark T. H. (eds.) Political psychology: New explorations. Routledge, New York: 1–12. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lenin W. I. (1975) Materialismus und Empiriokritizismus. Lenin Werke 14. Institut für Marxismus-Leninismus beim ZK der SED. Dietz Verlag, Berlin. Russian original published in 1909. English translation: Lenin W. I. (1972) Materialism and empirio-criticism: Critical comments on a reactionary philosophy. Lenin Collected Works, Volume 14. Progress Publishers, Moscow. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Marcuse H. (1991) One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Beacon, Boston. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Marx K. (1976) Theses on Feuerbach. Marx-Engels Collected Works, Volume 5. International Publishers, New York. Originally published in 1845. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mercer J. (2010) Emotional beliefs. International Organization 64(1): 1–31. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Milgram S. (1974) Obedience to authority: An experimental view. Harper Perennial Modern Classics, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nietzsche F. (1977) Menschliches Allzumenschliches. In: Friedrich Nietzsche Werke in drei Bänden, Volume 1. Edited by K. Schechta. Eighth edition. Hanser, Munich: 435–1008. Originally published in 1878. English translation: Nietzsche F. (1996) Human, all too human. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Norenzayan A. & Heine S. J. (2005) Psychological universals: What are they and how can we know? Psychological Bulletin 131(5): 763–784. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pascual-Leone A., Amedi A., Fregni F. & Merabet L. B. (2005) The plastic human brain cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 28: 377–401. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pembrey M. E. (2002) Time to take epigenetic inheritance seriously. European Journal of Human Genetics 10: 669–671. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Phelps E. A. (2006) Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annual Review of Psychology 57: 27–53. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Riegler A. (2001) Towards a radical constructivist understanding of science. Special Issue “The Impact of Radical Constructivism on Science.” Foundations of Science 6(1–3): 1–30. https://cepa.info/1860
Sherif M., Harvey O. J., White B. J., Hood W. R. & Sherif C. W. (1961) Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment, 10. University Book Exchange, Norman OK. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Spivak G. C. (1988) Can the subaltern speak? In: Nelson C. & Grossberg L. (eds.) Marxism and the interpretation of culture. University of Illinois Press, Urbana: 271–313. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stapelfeldt G. (2004) Theorie der Gesellschaft und empirische Sozialforschung: Zur Logik der Aufklärung des Unbewußten [Theory of society and empirical social research: On the logic of the enlightenment of the unconscious]. Ça-ira-Verlag, Freiburg. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tajfel H. & Turner J. C. (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Austin W. G. & Worchel S. (eds.) Psychology of intergroup relations. Nelson-Hall Publishers, Chicago: 7–24. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tajfel H., Billig M. G, Bundy R. P. & Flament C. (1971) Social categorization and intergroup behavior. Journal of Social Psychology 1(2): 149–178. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wendt A. (1992) Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization 46(2): 391–425. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.