Volume 16 · Number 3 · Pages 377–380
Author’s Response: Opacity and Complexity of Learning Black Boxes

Elena Esposito

Log in download the full text in PDF

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Abstract: Non-transparent machine learning algorithms can be described as non-trivial machines that do not have to be understood, but controlled as communication partners. From the perspective of sociological systems theory, the normative component of control should be addressed with a critical attitude, observing what is normal as improbable.

Citation

Esposito E. (2021) Author’s response: Opacity and complexity of learning black boxes. Constructivist Foundations 16(3): 377–380. https://constructivist.info/16/3/377

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Burrell J. (2016) How the machine “thinks”: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society 1: 1–12. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Esposito E. (2017) Artificial communication? The production of contingency by algorithms. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 46(4): 249–265. https://cepa.info/7142
Esposito E. (2021) Artificial communication: How algorithms produce social intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. In press. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (1985) Cibernetica ed epistemologia: Storia e prospettive [Cybernetics and epistemology: History and perspectives]. In: Bocchi G. & Ceruti M. (eds.) La sfida della complessità. Feltrinelli, Milano: 112–140. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (2003) Understanding understanding. Springer, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Harcourt B. E. (2007) Against prediction: Profiling, policing, and punishing in an actuarial age. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Langville A. N. & Meyer C. D. (2006) Google’s PageRank and beyond: The science of search engine rankings. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Latour B. (1999) Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1984) Soziale systeme. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. English translation: Luhmann N. (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1991) Soziologie des Risikos [Sociology of risk]. De Gruyter, Berlin. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1993) “Was ist der Fall?” und “Was steckt dahinter?” – Die zwei Soziologien und die Gesellschaftstheorie [“What is the case?” and “What’s behind it?” – The two sociologies and the social theory]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 22(4): 245–260. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft [The society of society]. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lum K. & Isaac W. (2016) To predict and serve? Significance 13(5): 14–19. https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1740–9713.2016.00960.x
Pasquale F. (2015) The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Perrow C. (1984) Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. Basic Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.