Volume 17 · Number 1 · Pages 064–069
Author’s Response: Constructivism Strengthens Epistemic Uncertainty - And This is Good News

Maciej Wodziński

Log in download the full text in PDF

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Abstract: Addressing methodological issues, I try to clarify relations between radical constructivism and the theories used as a basis of study by describing how social influences experienced by individuals are constructed. Also, I welcome the way other methodological questions may enrich future research by raising the issue of personal contact and inclusion of the first-person perspective in the construction of autism. Next, I discuss (a) the need to re-think the contemporary psychiatric/diagnostic category of autism; (b) some strong and weak points of the enactivist perspective; (c) the issue of inclusion of the “self-illness” relation in research on autism, as well as the validity of the term “illness” in this concept; and (d) the possibility of thinking about autism from the phenomenological perspective inspired by Heidegger’s category of understanding.

Citation

Wodziński M. (2021) Author’s response: Constructivism strengthens epistemic uncertainty - and this is good news. Constructivist Foundations 17(1): 064–069. https://constructivist.info/17/1/064

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Baron Cohen S. (2020) The pattern seekers: How autism drives human invention. Allen Lane, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bie B. & Tang L. (2015) Representation of autism in leading newspapers in China: A content analysis. Health Communication 30(9): 884–893. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Caplan P. J. (2014) Foreword. In: Burstow B., LeFrançois B. A. & Diamond S. (eds.) Psychiatry disrupted: Theorizing resistance and crafting the (r)evolution. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal & Kingston: xi–xv. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Chapman R. & Veit W. (2020) Representing the autism spectrum. The American Journal of Bioethics 20(4): 46–48. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fricker M. (2010) Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Georgiou K., Winter D., Davies S. & Katsiana A. (2021) “But who knows what autism is?” Negotiating the notion of autism during free associative narrative interviews with psychoanalytic psychotherapists. Materia Socio-Medica 33(2): 138–144. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Heidegger M. (1962) Being and time. Basil Blackwell, Oxford. German original published in 1927. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Heidegger M. (2012) Contributions to philosophy (of the event). Translated by Richard Rojcewicz and Daniela Vallega-Neu. Indiana University Press, Bloomington. German original published in 1989. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Huws J. C. & Jones R. S. P. (2011) Missing voices: Representations of autism in British newspapers, 1999–2008. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 39(2): 98–104. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Markova I. (2000) Amédée or how to get rid of it: Social representations from a dialogical perspective. Culture & Psychology 6(4): 419–460. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Moscovici S. & Duveen G. (2000) Social representations: Explorations in social psychology. Polity Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nelson R. H. (2021) A critique of the neurodiversity view. Journal of Applied Philosophy 38(2): 335–347. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Richman K. A. (2020) Neurodiversity and autism advocacy: Who fits under the autism tent? The American Journal of Bioethics 20(4): 33–34. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wodziński M. (2018) Autyzm jako doświadczenie źródłowe w antropologii apofatycznej [Autism as source experience in apophatic anthropology]. In: Szydłowska W. (ed.) Cezary Wodziński in memoriam. IFIS PAN, Warsaw: 167–186. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.