Volume 17 · Number 1 · Pages 083–086
Autopoiesis as Biological Theory and as Theoretical Metaphor

Simon Penny

Log in download the full text in PDF

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “From Liveness to “Lifeness”: Autopoiesis and an Enactive View of Performance” by Maiya Murphy. Abstract: I probe the extent to which a metaphorical deployment of the concept of autopoiesis has value in elucidating a notion of liveness in theater performance.

Citation

Penny S. (2021) Autopoiesis as biological theory and as theoretical metaphor. Constructivist Foundations 17(1): 083–086. https://constructivist.info/17/1/083

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Burnham J. (1968) Beyond modern sculpture. George Brazilier, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Burnham J. (1968) Systems aesthetics. Artforum 7(1): 30–35. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Callon M. (1986) The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle. In: M. Callon J. La. & A. Rip (eds.) Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. Macmillan Press, London: 19–34. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Di Paolo E. A., Cuffari E. & De Jaegher H. (2018) Linguistic bodies: The continuity between life and language. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. Reviewed in. https://constructivist.info/15/2/194
Dreyfus H. (1998) The current relevance of Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of embodiment. Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy 4: 1. https://cepa.info/2901
Fischer-Lichte E. (2008) The transformative power of performance. Routledge, Oxon. German original published in 2004. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gibson J. J. (1978) The ecological approach to the visual perception of pictures. Leonardo 11(3): 227–235. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hutchins E. (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ingold T. (2010) The textility of making. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34(1): 91–102. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jones A. (1998) Body art/performing the subject. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis MN. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kirsh D. & Maglio P. (1994) On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic actions. Cognitive Science 18(4): 513–549. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Latour B. (1986) The power of association. In: Law J. (ed.) Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? Routledge & Kegan-Paul, London: 196–223. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Law J. (1992) Notes on the theory of actor-network: Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. Systems Practice 5(4): 379–393. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luhmann N. (1995) Social systems. Translated by John Bednarz and Dirk Baecker. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA. German original published in 1984. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Malafouris L. (2013) How things shape the mind. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Reidel, Dordrecht. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pickering A. (1995) The mangle of practice. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Simon Penny is professor of Art, music and informatics at UCI. He is author of Making Sense: Cognition, Computing, Art, and Embodiment (2017), and an associate editor for AI and Society. In 2016, he was director of the conference “A Body of Knowledge: Embodied Cognition and the Arts.” He is co-originator and co-director of the Industrial Crafts Research Network (formed 2020) https://simonpenny.net.
Suchman L. (1987) Plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tribble E. B. & Sutton J. (2011) Cognitive ecology as a framework for Shakespearean studies. Shakespeare Studies 39: 94–103. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tribble E. B. (2005) Distributing cognition in the globe. Shakespeare Quarterly 56(2): 135–155. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zimmerman G. (2020) Devlin’s love: Autopoiesis and Harold Pinter’s Ashes to Ashes. SubStance 49(1): 74–96. https://cepa.info/6715

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.