For and Against Theory: Some Notes on Doing Neurophenomenology
Aleš Oblak
Log in download the full text in PDF
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Open peer commentary on the article “Enacting the “Body” of Neurophenomenology: Off-Radar First-Person Methodologies in Pragmatics of Experiencing” by Jakub Petri & Artur Gromadzki. Abstract: I offer a critical reading of Petri and Gromadzki’s target article, suggesting that it constructs a strawman neurophenomenology. I argue that the article is an exemplar of an overabundance of publications that hyper-focus on conceptual questions about neurophenomenology, which ultimately serve to detract from conducting neurophenomenological studies. Rather than introducing novel first-person methods in the form of somatic practices, I suggest that formal theory construction might be a better route towards iterative improvement of neurophenomenology.
Citation
Oblak A. (2022) For and against theory: Some notes on doing neurophenomenology. Constructivist Foundations 17(2): 115–119. https://constructivist.info/17/2/115
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
References
Arístegui R. (2017) Enaction and neurophenomenology in language. In: Ibáñez A., Lucas Sedeño L. & García A. M. (eds.) Neuroscience and social science: The missing link. Springer, New York: 471–500.
https://cepa.info/5711
Bitbol M. & Petitmengin C. (2017) Neurophenomenology and the micro-phenomenological interview. In: Schneider S. & Velmans M. (eds.) The Blackwell companion to consciousness. Second edition. Wiley & Sons, Hoboken NJ: 726–739.
https://cepa.info/4120
Caramazza A. (1986) On drawing inferences about the structure of normal cognitive systems from the analysis of patterns of impaired performance: The case for single-patient studies. Brain and Cognition 5(1): 41–66.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
de Hollander G., Forstmann B. U. & Brown S. D. (2016) Different ways of linking behavioral and neural data via computational cognitive models. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging 1(2): 101–109.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gallagher S. (2007) Neurophilosophy and neurophenomenology. In: Embree L. & Nenon T. (eds.) Phenomenology 2005. Volume 5. Zeta Press, Bucharest: 293–316.
https://cepa.info/2474
Hart T. (2008) Interiority and education: Exploring the neurophenomenology of contemplation and its potential role in learning. Journal of Transformative Education 6(4): 235–250.
https://cepa.info/6928
Kusters W. (2020) A philosophy of madness: The experience of psychotic thinking. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Laughlin C. D. & Rock A. J. (2013) Neurophenomenology: Enhancing the experimental and cross-cultural study of brain and experience. In: Friedman H. L. & Hartelius G. (eds.) The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of transpersonal psychology. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester: 261–280.
https://cepa.info/6374
Lutz A. & Thompson E. (2003) Neurophenomenology: Integrating subjective experience and brain dynamics in the neuroscience of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10: 31–52.
https://cepa.info/2363
Možina M. (2019) Epistemology of hallucinations and hearing voices: The contribution of constructivism and neurophenomenology. Slovenska revija za psihoterapijo Kairos 13(3–4): 27–71.
https://cepa.info/6838
Niikawa T., Miyahara K., Hamada H. T. & Nishida S. (2020) A new experimental phenomenological method to explore the subjective features of psychological phenomena: Its application to binocular rivalry. Neuroscience of Consciousness 2020(1): Niaa018.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niaa018
Oblak A. (2020) Visual representation in the wild: Empirical phenomenological investigation of visual-spatial working memory in a naturalistic setting. Constructivist Foundations 15(3): 238–250.
https://constructivist.info/15/3/238
Robbins B. & Gordon S. (2015) Humanistic neuropsychology: The implications of neurophenomenology for psychology. In: Schneider K., J. F. Pierson & Bugental J. F. T. (eds.) The handbook of humanistic psychology: Theory, research, and practice. Second edition. Sage, Los Angeles CA: 196–212.
https://cepa.info/7305
Robbins B. D. (2013) Enactive cognition and the neurophenomenology of emotion. In: Gordon S. (ed.) Neurophenomenology and its applications to psychology. Springer, New York: 1–24.
https://cepa.info/4144
Roy J. M., Petitot J., Pachoud B. & Varela F. J. (1999) Beyond the gap: An introduction to naturalizing phenomenology. In: Petitot J., Varela F. J., Pachoud B. & Roy J. M. (eds.) Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA: 1–83.
https://cepa.info/2034
Rupert R. D. (2015) Embodiment, consciousness, and neurophenomenology: Embodied cognitive science puts the (first) person in its place. Journal of Consciousness Studies 22(3–4): 148–180.
https://cepa.info/5657
Stewart J. (2019) Neurophenomenology, enaction, and autopoïesis. In: Palermo S. & Morese R. (eds.) Behavioral Neuroscience. IntechOpen, London.
https://cepa.info/6246
Stilwell P. & Harman K. (2021) Phenomenological research needs to be renewed: Time to integrate enactivism as a flexible resource. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20(1): 1–15.
https://cepa.info/7756
Strle T. (2013) Why should we study experience more systematically: Neurophenomenology and modern cognitive science. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 11(4): 376–390.
https://cepa.info/1067
Taylor E. (2013) Déjà vu: William James on “The Brain and the Mind,” 1878: A comment on current trends in neurophenomenology defining the application of James’s radical empiricism to psychology. In: Gordon S. (ed.) Neurophenomenology and its applications to psychology. Springer, New York: 89–114.
https://cepa.info/7311
Thompson E. (2004) Life and mind: From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology. A tribute to Francisco Varela. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3: 381–398.
https://cepa.info/1137
Thompson E. (2009) Life and mind: From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology. In: Clarke B. & Hansen M. (eds.) Emergence and embodiment: New essays on second-order systems theory. Duke University Press, Durham: 77–93.
https://cepa.info/4124
Thompson E., Lutz A. & Cosmelli D. (2005) Neurophenomenology: An introduction for neurophilosophers. In: Brook A. & Akins K. (eds.) Cognition and the brain: The philosophy and neuroscience movement. Cambridge University Press, New York: 40–97.
https://cepa.info/2374
Timmermann C., Roseman L., Schartner M., Milliere R., Williams L. T. J., Erritzoe D., Muthukumaraswamy S., Ashton M., Bendrioua A., Kaur O., Turton S., Nour M. M., Day C. M., Leech R., Nutt D. J. & Carhart-Harris R. L. (2019) Neural correlates of the DMT experience assessed with multivariate EEG. Scientific Reports 9: 16324.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598–019–51974–4
Varela F. J. (1999) The specious present: The neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In: Petitot J., Varela F. J., Pachoud B. & Roy J. M. (eds.) Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA: 266–314.
https://cepa.info/2081
Vörös S. (2013) Podobe neupodobljivega: Nevroznanost, fenomenologija, mistika [Images of the unimaginable: Neuroscience, phenomenology, mysticism]. KUD Logos, Ljubljana.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.