You are not logged in Log in


> About the Journal
> Board & Policies
> Guidelines for Authors
> Acknowledgment to Reviewers
> Constructivist Community: Authors
> Constructivist E-Paper Archive (CEPA)
> Call for Book Reviewers
> Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

LATEST ISSUES

Volume 18
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 17
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 16
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 15
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 14
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 13
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 12
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 11
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 10
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 9
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 8
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 7
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 6
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 5
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 4
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 3
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1
Volume 2
Numbers 2–3
Number 1
Volume 1
Number 3
Number 2
Number 1

FOLLOW US

Login to provide us with feedback
Issues ┆ Submit ┆ FAQ ┆ Index
Volume 17 · Number 3 · Pages 193–195
< Previous Paper · Next Paper >
The Virtues of Love, Love of Nature, and the Role of Participatory Sense-making

Geoffrey Dierckxsens & Lasse T. Bergmann

Log in to download the full text for free

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Share on

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Loving the Earth by Loving a Place: A Situated Approach to the Love of Nature” by Laura Candiotto. Abstract: We argue that Candiotto demonstrates the virtues of enactive listening in a loving epistemology making an important contribution to the field of enactive ethics. Some critical considerations are put forward concerning the concept of participatory sense-making in the current literature and its applicability to a relationship with nature.

Citation

Dierckxsens G. & Bergmann L. T. (2022) The virtues of love, love of nature, and the role of participatory sense-making. Constructivist Foundations 17(3): 193–195. https://constructivist.info/17/3/193

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Candiotto L. & De Jaegher H. (2021) Love in-between. The Journal of Ethics 25(4): 501–524. https://cepa.info/7687
De Jaegher H. & Di Paolo E. (2007) Participatory sense-making. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 6(4): 485–507. https://cepa.info/2387
De Jaegher H., Di Paolo E. & Gallagher S. (2010) Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(10): 441–447. https://cepa.info/4349
Di Paolo E. A., Cuffari E. C. & De Jaegher H. (2018) Linguistic bodies: The continuity between life and language. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. Reviewed in. https://constructivist.info/15/2/194
Dierckxsens G. & Bergmann L. T. (2022) Enactive ethics and hermeneutics: From bodily normativity to critical ethics. Topoi 41(2): 299–312. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maiese M. (2022) Mindshaping, enactivism, and ideological oppression. Topoi 41(2): 341–354. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mathews F. (2009) Introduction: Invitation to ontopoetics. PAN: Philosophy Activism Nature 6: 1–7. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Svenaeus F. (2022) Health and illness as enacted phenomena. Topoi 41(2): 373–382. https://cepa.info/7697
Varela F. J. (1991) Organism: A meshwork of selfless selves. In: Tauber A. (ed.) Organism and the origin of self. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 79–107. https://cepa.info/1959
Werner K. & Kiełkowicz-Werner M. (2022) From shared enaction to intrinsic value: How enactivism contributes to environmental ethics. Topoi 41(2): 409–423. https://cepa.info/7525

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.