Volume 17 · Number 3 · Pages 220–230
A Moving Boundary, a Plastic Core: A Contribution to the Third Wave of Extended-Mind Research

Timotej Prosen

Log in to download the full text for free

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Context: The current state of extended-mind research involves different frameworks, predictive processing and enactivism, among others. It is unclear to what degree these two frameworks converge toward a unified conception of the extended mind. Problem: The third wave of extended-mind research expands the scope of what has been acknowledged as a legitimate case of extended mind under the parity principle and complementarity principle of the first two waves. The two central commitments of the third wave are: (a) That extended cognitive agents exhibit plasticity (b) that extended cognitive systems may not be organism-centered. I explore a general notion of boundary that might accommodate those two claims and provide a general criterion of what constitutes a case of extended mind. Method: I employ the method of conceptual analysis. I explore several conceptions of mental boundary and plasticity with regard to the context of the wider conceptual frameworks within which they are embedded, namely predictive processing and enactivism. I confront the two frameworks with regard to how the notions they provide fare against the issues of third-wave extended-mind research. Results: a) I confront the notion of boundary of cognitive agents based on the Markov-blanket formalism with the enactivist notion of mental boundary based on operational closure and argue for the latter approach. (b) I argue that plasticity of mental boundaries exhibits two fundamental facets that can be distinguished and accounted for by recourse to Ashby’s conception of ultrastability and the notion of perceptual inference as employed by the free-energy principle, if the two notions are integrated into the enactivist framework. Implications: Predictive processing and enactivism cannot be reconciled regarding their respective notions of boundary of cognitive agents. In this regard, enactivism provides a better point of departure for the third wave of extended-mind research. Notions of active and perceptual inference based on the free-energy principle might nevertheless provide insights that enrich the enactivist position and lead to a more nuanced perspective on the extended mind. Constructivist content: Constructivist epistemology forms the theoretical background of some key notions, utilized throughout the article, namely the conception of mind as autonomous and self-organizing.

Key words: Enactivism, extended mind, free-energy principle, Markov blanket, predictive processing.


Prosen T. (2022) A moving boundary, a plastic core: A contribution to the third wave of extended-mind research. Constructivist Foundations 17(3): 220–230. https://constructivist.info/17/3/220

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Werner K. (2017) Coordination Produces Cognitive Niches, not just Experiences: A Semi-Formal Constructivist Ontology Based on von Foerster
Vörös S. & Riegler A. (2017) A Plea for not Watering Down the Unseemly: Reconsidering Francisco Varela’s Contribution to Science
Candiotto L. (2022) Loving the Earth by Loving a Place: A Situated Approach to the Love of Nature
Fultot M. F., Nie L. & Carello C. (2016) Perception-Action Mutuality Obviates Mental Construction
Villalobos M. & Ward D. (2016) Lived Experience and Cognitive Science Reappraising Enactivism’s Jonasian Turn


Allen M. & Friston K. (2018) From cognitivism to autopoiesis: Towards a computational framework for the embodied mind. Synthese 195(6): 2459–2482. https://cepa.info/4099
Ashby W. R. (1960) Design for a brain: The origin of adaptive behaviour. Chapman and Hall, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bruineberg J., Kiverstein J. & Rietveld E. (2018) The anticipating brain is not a scientist: The free-energy principle from an ecological-enactive perspective. Synthese 195(6): 2417–2444. https://cepa.info/4497
Chalmers D. & Clark A. (1998) The extended mind. Analysis 58(1): 10–23. https://cepa.info/4959
Clark A. (2003) Natural born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Clark A. (2008) Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Reviewed in. https://constructivist.info/5/2/97
Clark A. (2016) Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action and the extended mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Clark A. (2017) How to knit your own Markov blanket: Resisting the second law with metamorphic minds. In: Metzinger T. & Wiese W. (eds.) Philosophy and predictive processing. MIND Group, Frankfurt am Main. https://predictive-mind.net/papers/papers/how-to-knit-your-own-markov-blanket
Clark A. (2018) A nice surprise? Predictive processing and the active pursuit of novelty. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 17: 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097–017–9525-z
De Jaegher H. & Di Paolo E. A. (2007) Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4): 485–507. https://cepa.info/2387
Di Paolo E. A. & De Jaegher H. (2017) Neither individualistic nor interactionist. In: Durt C., Fuchs T. & Tewes C. (eds.) Embodiment, enaction, and culture: Investigating the constitution of the shared world. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 87–105. https://cepa.info/2301
Di Paolo E. A. (2005) Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences 4(4): 429–452. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Di Paolo E. A. (2009) Extended life. Topoi 28(1): 9–21. https://cepa.info/322
Di Paolo E. A., Cuffari E. C. & De Jaegher H. (2018) Linguistic bodies: The continuity between life and language. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. Reviewed in. https://constructivist.info/15/2/194
Di Paolo E. A., Thompson E. & Beer R. (2022) Laying down a forking path: Tensions between enaction and the free energy principle. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences 3: 2. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2022.9187
Friston K. J. & Stephan K. E. (2007) Free-energy and the brain. Synthese 159(3): 417–458. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Friston K. J. (2009) The free-energy principle: A rough guide to the brain? Trends in Cognitive Science 13(7): 293–301. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Friston K. J. (2013) Life as we know it. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 10(86): 20130475. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fuchs T. & De Jaegher H. (2009) Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8(4): 465–486. https://cepa.info/2274
Gallagher S. & Allen M. (2018) Active inference, enactivism and the hermeneutics of social cognition. Synthese 195(6): 2627–2648. https://cepa.info/4222
Gallagher S. (2018) The extended mind: State of the question. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 56(4): 421–447. https://cepa.info/6927
Hohwy J. (2013) The predictive mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hohwy J. (2016) The self-evidencing brain. Nous 50(2): 259–285. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hohwy J. (2017) How to entrain your evil demon. In: Metzinger T. & Wiese W. (eds.) Philosophy and predictive processing. MIND Group, Frankfurt am Main. https://predictive-mind.net/papers/how-to-entrain-your-evil-demon
Hohwy J. (2019) Quick’n’lean or slow and rich? Andy Clark on predictive processing and embodied cognition. In: Colombo M., Irvine E. & Stapleton M. (eds.) Andy Clark and his critics. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 191–205. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kirchhoff M. & Kiverstein J. (2019) Extended consciousness and predictive processing: A third-wave view. Routledge, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kirchhoff M. & Kiverstein J. (2020) Attuning to the world: The diachronic constitution of the extended conscious mind. Frontiers in Psychology 11: 1966. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01966
Kirchhoff M. & Kiverstein J. (2020) How to determine the boundaries of mind: A Markov blanket proposal. Synthese 198(8): 4791–4810. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kirchhoff M. (2012) Extended cognition and fixed properties: Steps to a third-wave version of extended cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11(3): 207–308. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kirchhoff M. (2018) Autopoiesis, free energy, and the life–mind continuity thesis. Synthese 195: 2519–2540. https://cepa.info/4834
Kirchhoff M., Parr T., Palacios E., Friston K. J. & Kiverstein J. (2018) The Markov blankets of life: Autonomy, active inference and the free energy principle. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 15(138): 20170792. https://cepa.info/5393
Loughlin V. (2020) Extended mind. In: Glăveanu V. P. (ed.) The Palgrave encyclopedia of the possible. Springer Nature, Cham. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Menary R. & Kirchhoff M. (2014) Cognitive transformations and extended expertise. Educational philosophy and theory 46(6): 1–14. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Menary R. (2010) Cognitive integration and the extended mind. In: Menary R. (ed.) The extended mind. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 227–243. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Merleau-Ponty M. (2005) Phenomenology of perception. Routledge, New York. French original published in 1945 ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
O’Brien G. (1998) Review of Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again, by Andy Clark. Metascience 7(1): 78–83. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Parr T., Pezzulo G. & Friston K. J. (2022) Active inference: The free energy principle in mind, brain, and behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pearl J. (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann, Portland OR. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ramstead M. J. D., Badcock P. & Friston K. J. (2018) Answering Schrödinger’s question: A free-energy formulation. Physics of Life Reviews 24: 1–16. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ramstead M. J. D., Kirchhoff M. D., Constant A. & Friston K. J. (2021) Multiscale integration: Beyond internalism and externalism. Synthese 198: 541–570. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ryan K. & Schiavio A. (2019) Extended musicking, extended mind, extended agency: Notes on the third wave. New Ideas in Psychology 55: 8–17. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Seth A. K. (2015) The cybernetic Bayesian brain: From interoceptive inference to sensorimotor contingencies. In: Metzinger T. & Windt J. M. (eds.) Open MIND: 35(T). MIND Group, Frankfurt am Main. https://open-mind.net/papers/the-cybernetic-bayesian-brain
Sutton J. (2010) Exograms and interdisciplinarity: History, the extended mind, and the civilizing process. In: Richard M. (ed.) The extended mind. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 189–225. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Szanto T. (2013) Shared extended minds: Towards a socio-integrationist account. In: Moyal-Sharrock D., Coliva A., & Munz A. M. (eds.) Mind, language and action. Proceedings of the 36th International Wittgenstein Symposium. De Gruyter, Berlin: 400–402. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Varela F. J. (1981) Autonomy and autopoiesis. In: Roth G. & Schwegler H. (eds.) Self-organizing systems: An interdisciplinary approach. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/New York: 14–24. https://cepa.info/2063
Varela F. J. (1992) Whence perceptual meaning? A cartography of current ideas. In: Varela F. J. & Dupuy J. P. (eds.) Understanding origins: Contemporary ideas on the origin of life, mind and society. Kluwer, Boston: 235–263. https://cepa.info/2074
Varela F. J. (1997) Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition. Brain and Cognition 34(1): 72–87. https://cepa.info/2010

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.