Volume 17 · Number 3 · Pages 270–273
Inductive Metaphysics and Goodman’s Starmaking Constructivism

Ansgar Seide

Log in download the full text in PDF

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “A Defence of Starmaking Constructivism: The Problem of Stuff” by Bin Liu. Abstract: Bin Liu defends a theory he calls “starmaking constructivism,” according to which all features of the world are constructed by us. I will first show that the general way Liu defends and argues for constructivism is strongly reminiscent of the tradition of inductive metaphysics, a tradition that emerged in the mid- and late 19th century and the early 20th century in Germany. I will then highlight an argument from this tradition against phenomenalism and for realism. Then I will argue that this argument is at least in part an objection that also applies to starmaking constructivism, thereby shifting the burden of arguing back to the constructivist’s side.

Citation

Seide A. (2022) Inductive metaphysics and goodman’s starmaking constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 17(3): 270–273. https://constructivist.info/17/3/270

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Becher E. (1914) Naturphilosophie [Philosophy of nature]. B. G. Teubner, Leipzig. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Becher E. (1921) Geisteswissenschaften und Naturwissenschaften: Untersuchungen zur Theorie und Einteilung der Realwissenschaften [Humanities and natural sciences: Studies on the theory and classification of the real sciences]. Duncker & Humblot, Munich. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Becher E. (1926) Metaphysik und Naturwissenschaften: Eine wissenschaftstheoretische Untersuchung ihres Verhältnisses [Metaphysics and natural sciences: An investigation of their relationship within philosophy of science]. Duncker & Humblot, Munich. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Engelhard K., Feldbacher-Escamilla C. J., Gebharter A. & Seide A. (2021) Inductive metaphysics: Editors’ introduction. Grazer Philosophische Studien 98(1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1163/18756735–00000129
Hartmann E. von (1885) Kritische Grundlegung des transcendentalen Realismus [Critical groundwork of transcendental realism]. Third revised and enlarged edition. Wilhelm Friedrich, Leipzig. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Külpe O. (1912–1923) Die Realisierung: Ein Beitrag zur Grundlegung der Realwissenschaften [A contribution to a groundwork of the real sciences]. First volume 1912, second volume 1920, third volume 1923. S. Hirzel, Leipzig. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Scholz O. R. (2018) Inductive social metaphysics – A defence of inference to the best explanation in the metaphysics of social reality: Comments on Katherine Hawley. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 49: 199–210. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Scholz O. R. (2018) Induktive Metaphysik: Ein vergessenes Kapitel der Metaphysikgeschichte [Inductive metaphysics: A forgotten chapter in the history of metaphysics]. In: Hommen D. & Sölch D. (eds.) Philosophische Sprache zwischen Tradition und Innovation. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main: 267–289. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Seide A. (2021) Analogical inference in Gustav Theodor Fechner’s inductive metaphysics. Grazer Philosophische Studien 98(1): 186–202. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Seide A. (2021) Points of convergence between logical empiricism and inductive metaphysics: Hans Reichenbach and Erich Becher in comparison. Synthese 199: 11075–11107. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Seide A. (2021) Wilhelm Wundts Logik als Auftakt zu einer induktiven Metaphysik [Wilhelm Wundt’s logic as a prelude to an inductive metaphysics]. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 75(4): 554–578. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.