Volume 18 · Number 2 ·
Pages 253–258
Authors’ Response: From 20th-Century Dialectics and Deconstruction to 21st-Century Transformative Monism
Log in to download the full text for free
Abstract
Abstract: In our response, we provide theoretical clarifications on how the functional dynamic systems approach allows a monist theorization of offline cognition and imagination; highlight the importance, for ontogenetic cultural development, of the system’s sensorimotor dynamics as well as this dynamics’ reification; elaborate on the notions of “field of promoted action,” “zone of proximal development,” “scaffolding,” and “repetition without repetition” as well as purported relations among these notions. We stress the transformative potential both of culture’s proleptic anticipation and, conversely, individuals’ non-linear rebellion against it. We also address questions regarding educational applicability, design, and classroom practices. Finally, we unpack the ethical and transformative role of our theoretical work in 21st-century educational science.
Citation
Shvarts A. & Abrahamson D. (2023) Authors’ response: From 20th-century dialectics and deconstruction to 21st-century transformative monism. Constructivist Foundations 18(2): 253–258. https://constructivist.info/18/2/253
Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)
References
Abrahamson D., Lee R. G., Negrete A. G. & Gutiérrez J. F. (2014) Coordinating visualizations of polysemous action: Values added for grounding proportion. ZDM 46(1): 79–93. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Alberto R., van Helden G. & Bakker A. (2022) Action-based embodied design for proportions: From the laboratory to the classroom. Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education 2(2): 174–207. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Alibali M. W. & Nathan M. J. (2012) Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences 21(2): 247–286. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Anderson M. L. (2010) Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(4): 245–266; discussion 266–313. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Barsalou L. W. (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 577–660. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Barsalou L. W. (2003) Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 358(1435): 1177–1187. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bastos A. M., Usrey W. M., Adams R. A., Mangun G. R., Fries P. & Friston K. J. (2012) Canonical microcircuits for predictive coding. Neuron 76(4): 695–711. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bernstein N. A. (1967) The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon press, Oxford. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bryson N. (1988) The gaze in the expanded field. In: Foster H. (ed.) Vision and visuality. The Bay Press, Seattle WA: 87–108. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Church R. B. & Goldin-Meadow S. (1986) The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition 23: 43–71. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Davydov V. V. (1990) In: Teller J. (ed.) Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston VA. http://www.marxists.org/archive/davydov/generalization/generalization.pdf
de Freitas E. & Sinclair N. (2013) New materialist ontologies in mathematics education: The body in/of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics 83(3): 453–470. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Epelboim J. & Suppes P. (2001) A model of eye movements and visual working memory during problem solving in geometry. Vision Research 41(12): 1561–1574. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Grant E. R. & Spivey M. J. (2003) Eye movements and problem solving. Psychological Science 14(5): 462–466. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gruters K. G., Murphy D. L. K., Jenson C. D., Smith D. W., Shera C. A. & Groh J. M. (2018) The eardrums move when the eyes move: A multisensory effect on the mechanics of hearing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115(6) E1309–E1318. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Guba E. G. & Lincoln Y. S. (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin N. K. & Lincoln Y. S. (eds.) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks CA: 105–117. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hall R. & Nemirovsky R. (eds.) (2012) Modalities of body engagement in mathematical activity and learning (Special issue). Journal of the Learning Sciences: 21(2). ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Harnad S. (1990) The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 42: 335–346. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Heft H. (1989) Affordances and the body: An intentional analysis of Gibson’s ecological approach to visual perception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19(1): 1–30. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Heft H. (2020) Ecological psychology and enaction theory: Divergent groundings. Frontiers in Psychology: 11. https://cepa.info/6631
Hutto D. D. & Abrahamson D. (2022) Embodied, enactive education: Conservative versus radical approaches. In: Macrine S. L. & Fugate J. M. B. (eds.) Movement matters: How embodied cognition informs teaching and learning. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 39–52. https://cepa.info/7989
Hutto D. D. & Sánchez-García R. (2015) Choking RECtified: Embodied expertise beyond Dreyfus. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14(2): 309–331. https://cepa.info/5802
Hutto D. D. & Satne G. (2015) The natural origins of content. Philosophia 43(3): 521–536. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jasanoff S. & Sang-Hyun K. (eds.) (2015) Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. University of Chicago, Chicago. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jermann P., Nüssli M.-A. & Li W. (2010) Using dual eye-tracking to unveil coordination and expertise in collaborative Tetris. In: McEwan T. & McKinnon L. M. (chairs) BCS ’10 Proceedings of the 24th BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference. American Computing Machinery, New York: 36–44. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kelso J. A. S. & Schöner G. (1988) Self-organization of coordinative movement patterns. Human Movement Science 7(1): 27–46. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kimmel M. & Preuschl E. (2016) Dynamic coordination patterns in Tango Argentino: A cross-rertilization of subjective explication methods and motion capture. In: Laumond J. P. & Abe N. (eds.) Dance notations and robot motion. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, Volume 111. Springer, Cham: 209–235. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kirchhoff M. D. & Kiverstein J. (2019) Extended consciousness and predictive processing. Routledge, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kirsh D. (2010) Thinking with the body. In: Ohlsson S. & Catrambone R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society, Austin TX: 2864–2869. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kirsh D., Caballero R. & Cuykendall S. (2012) When doing the wrong thing is right. In: Miyake N., Peebles D. & Cooper R. P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 34th Annual Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society, Austin TX: 1786–1791. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kosmas P. & Zaphiris P. (2023) Improving students’ learning performance through Technology-Enhanced Embodied Learning: A four-year investigation in classrooms. Education and Information Technologies. Online first. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Krichevets A., Shvarts A. & Chumachenko D. (2014) Perceptual action of novices and experts in operating visual representations of a mathematical concept. Psychology – Journal of Higher School of Economics 11(3): 55–78. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lambert S. G., Fiedler B. L., Hershenow C. S., Abrahamson D. & Gorlewicz J. L. (2022) A tangible manipulative for inclusive quadrilateral learning. The Journal on Technology and Persons with Disabilities 10: 66–81. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Leontiev A. N. (1978) Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Liu N., Mok C., Witt E. E., Pradhan A. H., Chen J. E. & Reiss A. L. (2016) NIRS-based hyperscanning reveals inter-brain neural synchronization during cooperative Jenga game with face-to-face communication. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10: 82. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00082
Liu S. & Takeuchi M. A. (2023) Embodied mathematical pedagogy to liberate racialized and multilingual bodies. Educational Studies in Mathematics 112(2): 267–287. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lockman J. J. (2000) A perception-action perspective on tool use development. Child Development 71(1): 137–144. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Luria A. R. (1973) The working brain. An introduction to neuropsychology. Allen Lane, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Macrine S. L. & Fugate J. M. B. (2022) Embodied cognition and its educational significance. In: Macrine S. L. & Fugate J. M. B. (eds.) Movement matters: How embodied cognition informs teaching and learning. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 13–24. https://cepa.info/7987
Maffia A. & Sabena C. (2020) On the mathematics teacher’s use of gestures as pivot signs in semiotic chains. For the Learning of Mathematics 40(1): 15–21. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Malafouris L. (2010) Knapping intentions and the marks of the mental. In: Malafouris L. & Renfrew C. (eds.) The cognitive life of things. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge: 13–22. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Malafouris L. (2019) Thinking as “thinging”: Psychology with things. Current Directions in Psychological Science 29(1): 3–8. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1992) The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala Publications, Boston MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. & Varela F. J. (1992) The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala, Boston. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Mechsner F., Kerzel D., Knoblich G. & Prinz W. (2001) Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature 414(6859): 69–73. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Menary R. & Gillett A. (2022) The tools of enculturation. Topics in Cognitive Science 14(2): 363–387. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Merleau-Ponty M. (2002) Phenomenology of perception. Routledge, Milton Park. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Merleau-Ponty M. (2002) Phenomenology of perception. Routledge, Milton Park. French original published in 1945. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Monaghan J., Trouche L. & Borwein J. M. (2016) Tools and mathematics. Springer, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nathan M. J. & Alibali M. W. (2011) How gesture use enables intersubjectivity in the classroom. In: Stam G. & Ishino M. (eds.) Integrating gestures: The interdisciplinary nature of gesture. John Benjamins, Amsterdam: 257–266. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nemirovsky R., Kelton M. L. & Rhodehamel B. (2013) Playing mathematical instruments: Emerging perceptuomotor integration with an interactive mathematics exhibit. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 44(2): 372–415. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Newell K. & Ranganathan R. (2010) Instructions as constraints in motor skill acquisition. In: Savelsbergh G., Davids K. & Renshaw I. (eds.) Motor learning in practice: A constraints-led approach. Routledge, Milton Park: 17–32. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Newen A., De Bruin L. & Gallagher S. (eds.) (2018) The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford UK. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Núñez R. E., Edwards L. D. & Filipe Matos J. (1999) Embodied cognition as grounding for situatedness and context in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics: 39(1/3): 45–65. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Oullier O., de Guzman G. C., Jantzen K. J., Lagarde J. & Kelso J. A. S. (2008) Social coordination dynamics: Measuring human bonding. Social Neuroscience 3(2): 178–192. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
O’Madagain C. & Tomasello M. (2021) Joint attention to mental content and the social origin of reasoning. Synthese 198(5): 4057–4078. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pagnotta M., Laland K. N. & Coco M. I. (2020) Attentional coordination in demonstrator-observer dyads facilitates learning and predicts performance in a novel manual task. Cognition 201: 104314. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pavlov I. P. (1927) Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. In: Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Oxford University Press, Oxford UK. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pelaprat E. & Cole M. (2011) “Minding the gap”: Imagination, creativity and human cognition. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 45(4): 397–418. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Petitmengin C. (2021) Anchoring in lived experience as an act of resistance. Constructivist Foundations 16(2): 172–181. https://constructivist.info/16/2/172
Piaget J. (1971) Genetic epistemology. Translated by Eleanor Duckworth. W. W. Norton & Company New York. French original published in 1970. https://cepa.info/8263
Pulvermüller F. (2013) Semantic embodiment, disembodiment or misembodiment? In search of meaning in modules and neuron circuits. Brain and Language 127(1): 86–103. https://cepa.info/7978
Rączaszek-Leonardi J. (2009) Symbols as constraints: The structuring role of dynamics and self-organization in natural language. Pragmatics & Cognition 17(3): 653–676. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Radford L. (2003) On the epistemological limits of language: Mathematical knowledge and social practice during the renaissance. Educational Studies in Mathematics 52(2): 123–150. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Radford L. (2010) The eye as a theoretician: Seeing structures in generalizing activities. For the Learning of Mathematics 30(2): 2–7. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Radford L. (2021) The theory of objectification. Sense/Brill, Rotterdam. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Radford L. (2021) The theory of objectification: A Vygotskian perspective on knowing and becoming in mathematics teaching and learning. Brill Sense, Leiden. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Reed E. S. & Bril B. (1996) The primacy of action in development. In: Latash M. L. & Turvey M. T. (eds.) Dexterity and its development. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ: 431–451. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Richardson M. J., Marsh K. L., Isenhower R. W., Goodman J. R. L. & Schmidt R. C. (2007) Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science 26(6): 867–891. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rietveld E., Denys D. & van Westen M. (2018) Ecological-enactive cognition as engaging with a field of relevant affordances: The Skilled Intentionality Framework (SIF). In: Newen A., de Bruin L. & Gallagher S. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 41–70. https://cepa.info/6678
Rizzolatti G., Cattaneo L., Fabbri-Destro M. & Rozzi S. (2014) Cortical mechanisms underlying the organization of goal-directed actions and mirror neuron-based action understanding. Physiological Reviews 94(2): 655–706. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Roth W.-M. & Jornet A. (2017) Understanding educational psychology: A late Vygotskian, Spinozist approach. Springer, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Roth W.-M. & Radford L. (2011) A cultural-historical perspective on mathematics teaching and learning. Sense, Rotterdam. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Roth W.-M. (2008) The dawning of signs in graph interpretation. In: Radford L., Schubring G. & Seeger F. (eds.) Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom, and culture. Sense, Rotterdam: 83–102. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sanches de Oliveira G., Raja V. & Chemero A. (2021) Radical embodied cognitive science and “Real Cognition.” Synthese 198(1): 115–136. https://cepa.info/7980
Schneider B., Sharma K., Cuendet S., Zufferey G. Dillenbourg P. & Pea R. (2018) Leveraging mobile eye-trackers to capture joint visual attention in co-located collaborative learning groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 13(4): 1–21. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sebanz N., Bekkering H. & Knoblich G. (2006) Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(2): 70–76. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Shapiro L. & Stolz S. A. (2019) Embodied cognition and its significance for education. Theory and Research in Education 17(1): 19–39. https://cepa.info/7980
Sheets-Johnstone M. (2015) Embodiment on trial: A phenomenological investigation. Continental Philosophy Review 48(1): 23–39. https://cepa.info/7090
Shvarts A. & Abrahamson D. (2019) Dual-eye-tracking Vygotsky: A microgenetic account of a teaching/learning collaboration in an embodied-interaction technological tutorial for mathematics. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 22: 100316. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Shvarts A. & Abrahamson D. (in press) Intercorporeal dynamic functional system: A dual eye-tracking study of student-tutor collaboration. In: Edwards L. & Krause C. (eds.) The body in mathematics. Sense/Brill, Rotterdam. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Shvarts A. & Bakker A. (2019) The early history of the scaffolding metaphor: Bernstein, Luria, Vygotsky, and before. Mind, Culture, and Activity 26(1): 4–23. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Shvarts A. & van Helden G. (2021) Embodied learning at a distance: From sensory-motor experience to constructing and understanding a sine graph. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, Latest Articles. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.1983691
Shvarts A. & van Helden G. (2021) Embodied learning at a distance: From sensory-motor experience to constructing and understanding a sine graph. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.1983691
Shvarts A. (2018) A dual eye-tracking study of objectification as student–tutor joint activity appropriation. In: Bergqvist E., Österholm M., Granberg C. & Sumpter L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 42nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Volume 4. PME, Umeå: 171–178. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Shvarts A. (2018) Joint attention in resolving the ambiguity of different presentations: A dual eye-tracking study of the teaching–learning process. In: Presmeg N., Radford L., Roth W.-M. & Kadunz G. (eds.) Signs of signification: Semiotics in mathematics education research. Springer, New York: 73–102. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Shvarts A. (2018) Joint attention in resolving the ambiguity of different presentations: A dual eye-tracking study of the teaching–learning process. In: Presmeg N., Radford L., Roth W.-M. & Kadunz G. (eds.) Signs of signification: Semiotics in mathematics education research. Springer, New York: 73–102. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Shvarts A., Alberto R., Bakker A., Doorman M. & Drijvers P. (2021) Embodied instrumentation in learning mathematics as the genesis of a body-artifact functional system. Educational Studies in Mathematics 107(3): 447–469. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Shvarts A., Alberto R., Bakker A., Doorman M. & Drijvers P. (2021) Embodied instrumentation in learning mathematics as the genesis of a body-artifact functional system. Educational Studies in Mathematics 107(3): 447–469. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sirotkina I. & Biryukova E. (2015) Futurism in physiology: Nikolai Bernstein, anticipation, and kinaesthetic imagination. In: Nadin M. (ed.) Anticipation: Learning from the past: The Russian/Soviet contributions to the science of anticipation. Springer, New York: 269–285. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sirotkina I. (1996) Выдающийся физиолог: Классик психологии? (К 100-летию со дня рождения Н. А. Бернштейна) [An outstanding physiologist: The classic of psychology? (To the 100-th anniversary of N. A. Bernstein)]. Психологический журнал 5: 116–127. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sirotkina I. (2018) Мир как живое движение: Интеллектуальная биография Николая Бернштейна. [The world as a living movement: An intellectual biography of Nikolai Bernstein]. Cogito-Centre, Moscow. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Souihel S. & Cessac B. (2021) On the potential role of lateral connectivity in retinal anticipation. The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience: 11(1): 1–60. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Steffe L. P. & Kieren T. (1994) Radical constructivism and mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 25(6): 711–733. https://cepa.info/2102
Steffensen S. V. & Harvey M. I. (2018) Ecological meaning, linguistic meaning, and interactivity. Cognitive Semiotics 11(1): 1–21. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stephen D. G., Boncoddo R. A., Magnuson J. S. & Dixon J. A. (2009) The dynamics of insight: Mathematical discovery as a phase transition. Memory and Cognition 37(8): 1132–1149. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stetsenko A. (2002) Commentary: Sociocultural activity as a unit of analysis: How Vygotsky and Piaget converge in empirical research on collaborative cognition. In: Bearison D. J. & Dorval B. (eds.) Collaborative cognition: Children negotiating ways of knowing. Ablex Publishing, New York: 123–135. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stetsenko A. (2017) The transformative mind: Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to development and education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stetsenko A. (2020) Research and activist projects of resistance: The ethical-political foundations for a transformative ethico-onto-epistemology. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 26: 100222. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stoate I. & Wulf G. (2011) Does the attentional focus adopted by swimmers affect their performance? International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching 6(1): 99–108. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Stone C. A. & Wertsch J. V. (1984) A social interactional analysis of learning disabilities remediation. Journal of Learning Disabilities 17(4): 194–199. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tancredi S., Abdu R., Balasubramaniam R. & Abrahamson D. (2022) Intermodality in multimodal learning analytics for cognitive theory development: A case from embodied design for mathematics learning. In: Giannakos M., Spikol D., Mitri D. D., Sharma K., Ochoa X. & Hammad R. (eds.) Multimodal learning analytics. Springer, New York: 133–158. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Tancredi S., Wang J. X., Li H. L., Yao C. J., Macfarlan G. L. & Ryokai K. (2022) Balance Board Math: “Being the graph” through the sense of balance for embodied self-regulation and learning. In: Horn M., Giannakos. M. & Pontual T. (eds.) Proceedings of IDC ’22: Interaction design and children. ACM, New York: 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1145/3501712.3529743
Thompson E. & Varela F. J. (2001) Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in cognitive sciences 5(10): 418–425. https://cepa.info/2085
Thompson E. & Varela F. J. (2001) Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5(10): 418–425. https://cepa.info/2085
Tucker M. & Ellis R. (1998) On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 24(3): 830–846. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Turvey M. T. (1977) Preliminaries to a theory of action with reference to vision. In: Shaw R. & Bransford J. (eds.) Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ: 211–265. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Turvey M. T. (2019) Lectures on perception. Routledge, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
van de Pol J., Volman M. & Beishuizen J. (2010) Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review 22(3): 271–296. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Van Den Herik J. C. (2018) Attentional actions: An ecological–enactive account of utterances of concrete words. Psychology of Language and Communication 22(1): 90–123. https://cepa.info/7981
van Dijk L. & Rietveld E. (2021) Situated anticipation. Synthese 198(1): 349–371. https://cepa.info/8097
Veissière S. P. L., Constant A., Ramstead M. J. D., Friston K. J. & Kirmayer L. J. (2020) Thinking through other minds: A variational approach to cognition and culture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43: E90. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vianna E. & Stetsenko A. (2006) Embracing history through transforming it: Contrasting Piagetian versus Vygotskian (activity) theories of learning and development to expand constructivism within a dialectical view of history. Theory & Psychology 16(1): 81–108. https://cepa.info/7982
Vygotsky L. S. (1965) Psychology and localization of functions. Neuropsychologia 3(4): 381–386. Russian original published in 1934. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vygotsky L. S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vygotsky L. S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vygotsky L. S. (1999) Scientific legacy. In: Reiber R. W. (ed.) The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 6. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vygotsky L. S. (2001) Лекции по педологии [Lectures on pedology]. Udmurt University, Izhevsk, Russia. Russian original partially published in 1935. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wenger E. (1998) Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Weser V. U. & Proffitt D. R. (2021) Expertise in tool use promotes tool embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science 13(4): 597–609. https://cepa.info/7983
Yu C. & Smith L. B. (2016) Multiple sensory-motor pathways lead to coordinated visual attention. Cognitive Science 41: 5–31. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zagorianakos A. (2015) The study of intuition as an objectifying act from a Husserlian perspective, in the cases of three prospective teachers of mathematics. Manchester Metropolitan University, UK. https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/595477/1/Zagorianakos-PhD Thesis_final.pdf
Zaporozhets A. P., Markova T. A. & Radina E. I. (1968) Fifty years of Soviet preschool pedagogy. Soviet Education 10(4): 3–14. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zavershneva E. & van der Veer R. (eds.) (2018) Vygotsky’s notebooks: A selection. Springer, Singapore. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Zipora G. L., Shimon U. & Ehud A. (2021) Oculo-retinal dynamics can explain the perception of minimal recognizable configurations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(34): E2022792118. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.