Volume 18 · Number 2 · Pages 286–288
Is it as Simple as “E-Teaching Good” Versus “Standardised Teaching Bad”?

Alf Coles

Log in to download the full text for free

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Open peer commentary on the article “Random Walks as a Royal Road to E-STEAM in Math Education” by Amaranta Valdés-Zorrilla, Daniela Díaz-Rojas, Leslie Jiménez & Jorge Soto-Andrade. Abstract: While sympathetic to much of what the authors of the target article write, I claim that there is a binary in their thinking, i.e., the one in the title of my commentary. I argue that such binaries obscure some groups and, in this case, one thing relatively hidden is the role of the teacher, in the lessons described. An alternative to positing an opposition between teaching approaches would be to apply the principles of “E-teaching” to working with teachers, as well as students.


Coles A. (2023) Is it as simple as “e-teaching good” versus “standardised teaching bad”? Constructivist Foundations 18(2): 286–288. https://constructivist.info/18/2/286

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)


Varela F. J. (1976) Not one, not two. CoEvolution Quarterly 12: 62–67. https://cepa.info/2055

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.