Volume 18 · Number 2 · Pages 308–310
Like a Fish Out of Water, Is Creativity Caught in the Crossfire of Brain-Body-Environment Interaction?

Francisco J. Parada

Log in to download the full text for free

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Open peer commentary on the article “Catching the Big Fish: A 4E-Cognition Approach to Creativity in STEAM Education” by Ronnie Videla, Tomas Veloz & María Carolina Pino. Abstract: Understanding creativity in STEAM education from the 4E perspective is a virtuous idea. In my commentary, I focus on critically evaluating the author’s fish-catching metaphor to discuss interaction’s role in creativity further. Furthermore, I will raise the issue of constitutiveness regarding environmental factors used in the creative experience.


Parada F. J. (2023) Like a fish out of water, is creativity caught in the crossfire of brain-body-environment interaction? Constructivist Foundations 18(2): 308–310. https://constructivist.info/18/2/308

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)


Bahrum S., Wahid N. & Ibrahim N. (2017) Integration of STEM education in Malaysia and why to STEAM. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 7(6): 645–654. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i6/3027
Clark A. & Chalmers D. (1998) The extended mind. Analysis 58(1): 7–19. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
De Jaegher H., Di Paolo E. & Gallagher S. (2010) Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(10): 441–447. https://cepa.info/4349
Djebbara Z., Jensen O. B., Parada F. J. & Gramann K. (2022) Neuroscience and architecture: Modulating behavior through sensorimotor responses to the built environment. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 138: 104715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104715
Fodor J. (1983) The modularity of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge MA. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Howard-Jones P. A. (2014) Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15(12): 817–824. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Laland K. N., Odling-Smee J. & Feldman M. W. (2000) Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(1): 131–46; discussion 146–75. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Laland K., Matthews B. & Feldman M. W. (2016) An introduction to niche construction theory. Evolutionary Ecology 30: 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-016-9821-z
Menary R. (2010) Cognitive integration and the extended mind. In: The extended mind. MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 227–243. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Newen A., Griem M. & Pika S. (2022) A conceptual framework for empathy in humans and nonhuman animals. In: Pfisterer C. C., Rathgeb N. & Schmidt E. (eds.) Wittgenstein and beyond. Routledge, New York: 203–224. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Palacios-García I. & Parada F. J. (2021) The holobiont mind: A bridge between 4E cognition and the microbiome. Adaptive Behavior, OnlineFirst. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pasquinelli E. (2012) Neuromyths: Why do they exist and persist? Mind, Brain and Education Society 6(2): 89–96. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Prinz J. (2006) Is the mind really modular? In: Stainton R. J. (ed.) Contemporary debates in cognitive science. Blackwell, Malden MA: 22–36. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rojas-Líbano D. & Parada F. J. (2019) Body–world coupling, sensorimotor mechanisms, and the ontogeny of social cognition. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 3005. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03005
Sterelny K. (2010) Minds: Extended or scaffolded? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9(4): 465–481. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wrangham R. & Conklin-Brittain N. (2003) Cooking as a biological trait. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 136(1): 35–46. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.