Beyond the Big Fish: Embracing the Fluidity of Creativity in Embodied, Embedded, and Enacted Processes
Wendy Ross
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Open peer commentary on the article “Catching the Big Fish: A 4E-Cognition Approach to Creativity in STEAM Education” by Ronnie Videla, Tomas Veloz & María Carolina Pino. Abstract: I look at the implications of the 4E approach to understanding creativity. I argue that the focus on originality and ideation (even if both are understood as extended and distributed) reflects a lingering Cartesian dualism rather than a commitment to understanding creativity as it unfolds in the world.
Citation
Ross W. (2023) Beyond the big fish: Embracing the fluidity of creativity in embodied, embedded, and enacted processes. Constructivist Foundations 18(2): 311–312. https://constructivist.info/18/2/311
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
References
Alač M. (2011) Handling digital brains: A laboratory study of multimodal semiotic interaction in the age of computers. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi M. (2014) Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In: The systems model of creativity: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Springer, Dordrecht: 47–61.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Fodor J. A. (1980) Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3(1): 63–73.
https://cepa.info/4845
Glăveanu V. P. (2014) Distributed creativity: Thinking outside of the box of the individual. Springer, Cham.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glăveanu V. P. (2020) A sociocultural theory of creativity: Bridging the social, the material, and the psychological. Review of General Psychology 24(4): 335–354.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hacking I. (1982) Experimentation and scientific realism. Philosophical Topics 13(1): 71–87.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ingold T. (2021) Imagining for real: Essays on creation, attention and correspondence. Routledge, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Katz‐Buonincontro J. & Anderson R. C. (2020) A review of articles using observation methods to study creativity in education (1980–2018) The Journal of Creative Behavior 54(3): 508–524.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kaufman J. C. & Beghetto R. A. (2009) Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology 13(1): 1–12.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kimmel M. & Hristova D. (2021) The micro-genesis of improvisational co-creation. Creativity Research Journal 33(4): 347–375.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ross W. & Glăveanu V. (2023) The constraints of habit: Craft, repetition, and creativity. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, Online first.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ross W. & Groves M. (2023) Let’s just see what happens: A qualitative case study of risk and uncertainty in the creative process. Journal of Creative Behavior, Early view.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.578
Ross W. (2022) Heteroscalar serendipity and the importance of accidents. In: Ross W. & Copeland S. (eds.) The art of serendipity. Palgrave MacMillan, Cham: 75–99.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Runco M. A. & Jaeger G. J. (2012) The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal 24(1): 92–96.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sawyer R. K. (2006) Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music 34(2): 148–165.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Sawyer R. K. (2012) Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford University Press, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Vallée‐Tourangeau F. (in press) Insight in the kinenoetic field. In: Ball L. J. & Vallée‐Tourangeau F. (eds.) Routledge handbook of creative cognition. Routledge.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.