The Paradox of Autopoietic Artificial Intelligent Systems in Education
Philip Baron
Free Access
Download the full text in
PDF (94 kB)
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Open peer commentary on the article “Autopoiesis and 4E+ Cognition in the Design of Digital Learning Affordances” by Claudio Aguayo. Abstract: An autopoietic educational system may provide for immersive individualised learning experiences that cater to the unique interests of each student; however, universities generally require uniformity in education to enable group assessments and accreditation and thus do not readily accommodate individualised tuition. A further challenge is that for a system to be autopoietic, it should be able to create its own rules; this may be at odds with the educator’s goals for their courses.
Citation
Baron P. (2023) The paradox of autopoietic artificial intelligent systems in education. Constructivist Foundations 18(2): 340–342. https://constructivist.info/18/2/340
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
References
Bandura A. & Walters R. H. (1977) Social learning theory. Volume 1. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Baron P. (2018) Ethical inclusive curricula design: Conversational teaching and learning. South African Journal of Higher Education 32(6): 326–350.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Becvar D. S. & Becvar R. J. (2006) Family therapy: A systemic integration. Sixth edition. Pearson Education, Boston MA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ji Z., Lee N., Frieske R., Yu T., Su D., Xu Y., Ishii E., Bang Y., Madotto A. & Fung P., (2022) Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys 55(12): 248.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Maturana H. R. (1988) Ontology of observing: The biological foundations of self-consciousness and the physical domain of existence. In: Donaldson R. E. (ed.) Texts in cybernetic theory: An in-depth exploration of the thought of Humberto Maturana, William T. Powers, and Ernst von Glasersfeld. American Society for Cybernetics (ASC.
https://cepa.info/597
Riegler A. (2008) The paradox of autonomy: The interaction between humans and autonomous cognitive artifacts. In: Dodig-Crnkovic G. & Stuart S. (eds.) Computing, philosophy, and cognitive science. The nexus and the liminal. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge: 292–301.
https://cepa.info/292
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.