The Yerkish Language: From Operational Methodology to Chimpanzee Communication

Bettoni, Marco C.

Volume 2 · Number 2-3 · Pages 32–38

< Previous Paper · Next Paper >

The Yerkish Language: From Operational Methodology to Chimpanzee Communication

Marco C. Bettoni

Abstract

Purpose: Yerkish is an artificial language created in 1971 for the specific purpose of exploring the linguistic potential of nonhuman primates. The aim of this paper is to remind the research community of some important issues and concepts related to Yerkish that seem to have been forgotten or appear to be distorted. These are, particularly, its success, its promising aspects for future research and last but not least that it was Ernst von Glasersfeld who invented Yerkish: he coined the term “lexigrams,” created the first 120 of them and designed the grammar that regulated their combination. Design: The first part of this paper begins with a short outline of the context in which the Yerkish language originated: the original LANA project. It continues by presenting the language itself in more detail: first, its design, focusing on its “lexigrams” and its “correlational” grammar (the connective functions or “correlators” and the combinations of lexigrams, or “correlations”), and then its use by the chimpanzee Lana in formulating sentences. The second part gives a brief introduction to the foundation of Yerkish in Silvio Ceccato’s Operational Methodology, particularly his idea of the correlational structure of thought and concludes with the main insights that can be derived from the Yerkish experiment seen in the light of Operational Methodology. Findings: Lana’s success in language learning and the success of Yerkish during the past decades are probably due to the characteristics of Yerkish, particularly its foundation in operational methodology. The operation of correlation could be what constitutes thinking in a chimpanzee and an attentional system could be what delivers the mental content that correlation assembles into triads and networks. Research implications: Since no other assessment or explanation of Lana’s performances has considered these foundational issues (findings), a new research project or program should validate the above-mentioned hypotheses, particularly the correlational structure of chimpanzee thinking.

Key words: Yerkish, artificial language, correlational grammar, operational methodology, Silvio Ceccato, machine translation, animal communication

Citation

Bettoni M. C. (2007) The yerkish language: From operational methodology to chimpanzee communication. Constructivist Foundations 2(2-3): 32–38. http://constructivist.info/2/2-3/032

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

References

Ceccato S. & Zonta B. (1980) Linguaggio, Consapevolezza, Pensiero. Feltrinelli, Milan. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Ceccato S. (1951) Language and the table of Ceccatieff. Hermann & Cie, Paris. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Ceccato S. (1953) Consapevolizzazione dell’Osservare, mod. 3", Atti del Congresso di Metodologia. Ramella, Torino. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Ceccato S. (1964) A model of the mind. Methodos 16: 3–78. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Ceccato S. (1964/1966) Un tecnico fra i filosofi. Vol. 1 & 2. Marsilio, Padova. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Ceccato S. (1967) Correlational analysis and mechanical translation. ORIGINAL CITATION. Reprinted in: Nirenburg S., Somers H. & Wilks Y. (eds.) (2003) Readings in machine translation. MIT Press, Cambridge. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

1961) Linguistic analysis and programming for mechanical translation. Feltrinelli: Milan & Gordon & Breach, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Gardner B. T. & Gardner R. A. (1971) Two-way communication with an infant chimpanzee. In: Schrier A. M. & Stollnitz F. (eds.) Behavior of non-human primates. Vol. 4. Academic Press, New York: 117–184. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Gardner R. A. & Gardner B. T. (1969) Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee. Science 165: 664–672. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von & Pisani P. P. (1968) The Multistore System MP-2. Scientific Progress Report, Grant AFOSR 1319–67. Georgia Institute for Research, Athens. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1965) An approach to the semantics of propositions. In: Proceedings of the conference on computer-related semantic analysis, December 3–5, 1965, Las Vegas USA. National Science Foundation & Office of Naval Research U. S. Air Force: XIII 1–24. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1970) The correlational approach to language. Thought and Language in Operations 1(4): 391–398. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1974) The Yerkish language for non-human primates. American Journal of Computational Linguistics 1, microfiche 12. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1977) Linguistic communication: Theory and definition. In: Rumbaugh D. M. (ed.) Language Learning by a Chimpanzee: The LANA project. Academic Press, New York: 55–71. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1977) The Yerkish language and its automatic parser. In: Rumbaugh D. M. (ed.) Language Learning by a Chimpanzee: The LANA project. Academic Press, New York: 91–129. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Glasersfeld E. von (2000) Silvio Ceccato and the Correlational Grammar. In: Hutchins W. J. (ed.) Early years in machine translation. John Benjamins, Amsterdam: 313–324. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/242

Hutchins J. (ed.) (2000) Early years in machine translation. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Lehmann D., Koenig T., Pascual-Marqui R. D., Koukkou M. & Strik W. K. (2000) Functional tomography of EEG microstates of visual imagery and abstract thought: Building blocks of conscious experience. Brain Topography 12: 298. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Lehmann D., Strik W. K., Henggeler B., Koenig T. & Koukkou M. (1998) Brain electric microstates and momentary conscious mind states as building blocks of spontaneous thinking: I. Visual Imagery and abstract thoughts. Int. J. Psychophysiology 29: 1–11. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Maturana H. R. & Varela F. (1987) The tree of knowledge. The biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala, Boston. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Rumbaugh D. M. & Washburn D. A. (2003) Intelligence of apes and other rational beings. Yale Universitiy Press, New Haven. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

1980) Reference: The linguistic essential. Science 210: 922–925. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

1994) Kanzi: The ape at the brink of the human mind. John Wiley Publishers, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Sowa J. (1984) Conceptual structures. Information processing in mind and machine. Addison-Wesley: Reading. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Terrace H. S., Petitto L. A., Sanders R. J. & Bever T. G. (1979) Can an ape create a sentence? Science 206: 891–902. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.

LATEST ISSUES

FOLLOW US

Abstract

Citation

Similar articles

References

Comments: 0