Volume 2 · Number 2-3 · Pages 72–80
Epistemology Returns to Its Roots

Herbert F. J. Müller

Log in download the full text in PDF

> Citation > Similar > References > Add Comment


Purpose: Understanding the place of Ernst von Glasersfeld’s Radical Constructivism (RC), and some of its implications, in the development of epistemology. Design: Characterization of two main options for the content of “knowledge” (without and with belief in mind-independent structures), sketch of their history in occidental thought; comparison of their properties concerning subjectivity, objectivity, second-order cybernetics, reliability of mental tools, and the needs and mechanisms for certainty and overall structures. Findings: Awareness that we structure mental working tools can, as RC suggests, replace belief in mind-independent reality, and this change dissolves the conceptual problem of metaphysics-ontology, but also eliminates the certainty expected from it, which raises the possibility of relativism. Working-concepts cannot be deconstructed because they imply no ontological claims. Subject(s) are necessarily included in all knowledge (which does not mean solipsism): because subjective experience encompasses all mental tools, including those of objectivity and mathematics, while in contrast the subject itself cannot become an objective system. Practical reliability of mental tools differs from subjective certainty, which requires an ontological leap of faith to positive beliefs: for specific tools including automata, and for positive holistic structures. However, in agreement with the constructivist view, holistic views can instead have an unstructured center, with reliability = viability, which prevents relativism. In sum, belief in mid-independent reality is needed for certainty if desired; for all other purposes constructivism is more helpful. Implications: The change in view suggested by von Glasersfeld’s work is of relevance for a number of fields of study with conceptual problems (such as the mind-brain relation). However, due to their generality, the implications will need evaluation in specific instances. The question of certainty needs attention for practical reasons.

Key words: subject-inclusiveness, cybernetics, back-up function


Müller H. F. J. (2007) Epistemology returns to its roots. Constructivist Foundations 2(2-3): 72–80. http://constructivist.info/2/2-3/072

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Kauffman L. H. (2016) Cybernetics, Reflexivity and Second-Order Science
Umpleby S. A. (2016) Second-Order Cybernetics as a Fundamental Revolution in Science
Gasparyan D. (2016) Consciousness as Self-Description in Differences
Scott B. & Bansal A. (2013) A Cybernetic Computational Model for Learning and Skill Acquisition
Brier S. (2009) Cybersemiotic Pragmaticism and Constructivism


Baggott J. (2004) Beyond measure. Modern physics, philosophy and the meaning of quantum theory. With a foreword by Peter Atkins. Oxford University Press, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bridgman P. (1927) The logic of modern physics. MacMillan, New York. Introduction and first chapter retrieved from http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/us/bridgman.htm on 30 June 2006. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Feyerabend P. K. (1999) Conquest of abundance. A tale of abstraction versus the richness of being. (Edited by Bert Terpstra). University of Chicago Press, Chicago. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von & Glasersfeld E. von (1999) Wie wir uns erfinden. Carl Auer, Heidelberg. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Foerster H. von (1992) Ethics and second-order cybernetics. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 1: 9–19. French original published in 1991 in: Ray Y. & Prieur B. (eds.) Système, ethique. Perspectives en thérapie familiale. ESF editeur, Paris: 41–55. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1985) Einführung in den radikalen Konstruktivismus. In: Watzlawick P. (ed.) Die erfundene Wirklichkeit. Wie wissen wir, was wir zu wissen glauben? Piper: München: 16–38. English version: Glasersfeld E. von (1984) An introduction to radical constructivism. In: Watzlawick P. (ed.) The invented reality: How do we know? W. W. Norton, New York: 17–40. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/070.1
Glasersfeld E. von (1985) L’approche constructiviste: Vers une théorie des représentations. Séminaire sur la représentation, 21 novembre 1985, no 7, CIRADE, Université du Québec à Montréal. Published in: Jonnaert P. & Masciotra D. (eds.) (2004) Constructivisme, choix contemporains. Hommage à Ernst von Glasersfeld. Presses de I’Université du Québec: Sainte Foy: 213–224. Posted, with an English translation by H. F. J. Müller, as Target Article 73 in the Karl Jaspers Forum http://www.kjf.ca/ on 31 July 2004. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (1991) Knowing without metaphysics: Aspects of the radical constructivist position. In: Steier F. (ed.) Research and reflexivity. Sage Publications, London: 12–29. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/132
Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructivism. A way of knowing and learning. Studies in mathematics education series 6. Falmer Press, London. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (2001) Self – reflection – consciousness. A tentative constructivist exploration. Presented at the Douglas-McGill Symposium on “Mind-Construction-Brain”, 28 September 2001. Posted in the Karl Jaspers Forum http://www.kjf.ca/ as Target Article 43 on 6 Nov 2001. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von (2005) Thirty years constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 1(1): 9–12. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/1/1/009.glasersfeld
Glasersfeld E. von (2006) A constructivist approach to experiential foundations of mathematical concepts revisited. Constructivist Foundations 1(2): 61–72. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/1/2/061.glasersfeld
Hegel G. W. F. (1949) Phänomenologie des Geistes. Felix Meiner: Leipzig. Originally published in 1807. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Heidegger M. (1953) Sein und Zeit. Max Niemeyer, Tübingen. Originally published in 1926. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Horvath P. (1997) Jakob von Uexküll. Von Mückensonnen und Umweltröhren. Retrieved from http://members.surfeu.at/patrick.horvath/uex.htm on 30 June 2006. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jaspers K. (1991) Von der Wahrheit. Piper, Munich.Originally published in 1948. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kant I. (1936) Opus postumum, Erste Hälfte. Walter de Gruyter & Co, Berlin. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Kierkegaard S. A. (2005) Entweder-Oder. Teil I und II. (Translated by H. Fauteck). Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, Munich. Originally published in 1843 in Danish language. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lakoff G. & Núñez R. E. (2000) Where mathematics comes from. Basic Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lindley D. (1996) Where does the weirdness go? Why quantum mechanics is strange, but not as strange as you think. Basic Books, New York. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Müller H. F. J. (2005) People, tools, and agency: Who is the kybernetes? Constructivist Foundations 1(1): 35–48. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/1/1/035.muller
Nestle E. & Aland K. (1963) Novum Testamentum Graece et Latine. 22nd edition. Württembergische Bibelanstalt: Stuttgart. Originally published in 1903. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Nietzsche F. W. (1994) Der Fall Wagner. Götzen-Dämmerung. Nietzsche contra Wagner (Edited by P. Pütz). Goldmann, Munich. Orginally published 1888–1889. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Noë, A. (2006) Beyond the eye. Review of D. H. Hubel & T. Wiesel, Brain and visual function. The story of a twenty-five year collaboration. Times Literary Supplement (5 May 2006): 12–13. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Percheron M. (1958) Buddha in Selbstzeugnissen und Bilddokumenten. (Translated by J. Rassat). Rowohlt, Hamburg. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pope Benedict XVI (2006) Glaube, Vernunft, Universität. Papstrede an der Uni Regensburg. http://www.radiovaticana.org/ted/Articolo.asp?c=94864
Reidemeister K. (1954) Die Unsachlichkeit der Existenzphilosophie. Vier kritische Aufsätze. Springer, Berlin. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Riegler A. (2005) Editorial. The constructivist challenge. Constructivist Foundations 1(1): 1–8. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/1/1/001.riegler
Umpleby S. (1991) Strategies for winning acceptance of second order cybernetics. Presented at the international symposium on systems research, informatics and cybernetics. Baden-Baden, Germany, August 12–18, 1991. Posted as Target Article 87 in the Karl Jaspers Forum http://www.kjf.ca/ on 11 March 2006. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Umpleby S. (2002) The design of intellectual movements. Published in the proceedings of the annual meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, Beijing, China, August 2–6, 2002. Posted as Target Article 86 in the Karl Jaspers Forum http://www.kjf.ca/ on 11 March 2006. ▸︎ Google︎ Scholar

Comments: 0

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.