Radical Constructivism has been Viable. On the Democratization of Math Education
Ana Pasztor
Log in download the full text in PDF
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Motivation: Paralleling my own transformation from a Platonist to a radical constructivist, mathematics education has been experiencing for more than a decade a movement that started in theoretical foundations mostly originating in von Glasersfeld’s work, and then reached professional organizations, which have been leading extensive efforts to reform school mathematics according to constructivist principles. However, the theories espoused by the researchers are, as yet, too abstract to lend themselves readily to implementation in the classroom. AB=Purpose: I define a shared experiential language (SEL) for the constructivist teacher to embody in order to transform her practice congruently according to constructivist principles. While SEL is comprised of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) subjective experience distinctions, what “makes it tick” is the constructivist epistemology with its insight that for consistent understanding to happen, new knowledge has to attach to prior experiences in a process of co-construction. Throughout the paper, I elaborate and validate this insight by numerous examples. Practical implications: Utilizing SEL allows understanding of mathematics to be rooted in each student’s individual sensory experiences, thus shifting the responsibility for success in mathematics from the students back to those who guide them in co-constructing knowledge. This, in turn, should allow everybody access to understanding and so it should no longer be socially acceptable to fail in mathematics.
Key words: radical constructivism, math education, neuro-linguistic programming, sensory experience, behavioral cues, democratization
Citation
Pasztor A. (2007) Radical constructivism has been viable. On the democratization of math education. Constructivist Foundations 2(2-3): 98–106. http://constructivist.info/2/2-3/098
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Alacaci C. & Pasztor A. (2002) Effects of state assessment preparation materials on students’ learning of school mathematics – A study. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 21: 225–253.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Askey R. (1999) Why does a negative a negative = a positive? American Educator 23(3): 10–11.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Bandler R. & MacDonald W. (1988) An insider’s guide to sub-modalities. Meta Publications: Cupertino, CA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Davis R. B. & Maher C. A. (1997) How students think: The role of representations. In: English L. (ed.) Mathematical reasoning. analogies, metaphors, and images. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ: 93–115.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dilts R., Grinder J., Bandler R., Bandler L. & Delosier J. (1980) Neuro-Linguistic Programming, Volume I: The study of the structure of subjective experience. Meta Publications: Cupertino, CA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
English L. (1997) Analogies, metaphors, and images: Vehicles for mathematical reasoning. In: English L. (ed.) Mathematical reasoning. analogies, metaphors, and images. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ: 4–18.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hale-Haniff M. & Pasztor A. (1999) Co-constructing subjective experience: A constructivist approach. Dialogues in Psychology 16.0. http://hubcap.clemson.edu/psych/oldpage/Dialogues/16.0.html.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hale-Haniff M. (2004) Transforming the meta model of NLP to enhance listening skills of postmodern family therapy. Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hoffman L. (1990) A constructivist position for family therapy. In: Keeney B. P., Nolan B. F. & Madsen W. L. (eds.), The systemic therapist. St. Paul: Minneapolis: 23–31.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jung C. (1962) Erinnerungen, Träume, Gedanken von C. G. Jung. Recorded and published by Aniela Jaffé. Rascher Verlag: Zürich & Stuttgart.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lakatos I. (1976) Proofs and refutations. The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lakoff G. & Nuñez R. E. (1997) Cognitive foundations for a mind-based mathematics. In: English L. (ed.) Mathematical reasoning. Analogies, metaphors, and images. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ: 21–92.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lakoff G. & Nuñez R. E. (2000) Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. Basic Books, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lincoln Y. S. & Guba E. G. (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
McNeill R. (1988) A reflection on when I loved math and how I stopped. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 7: 45–50.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics) (2000) Principles and standards for school mathematics. http://standards.nctm.org/protoFINAL/.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pasztor A. & Slater J. (2000) Acts of alignment: Of women in math and science and all of us who search for balance. Peter Lang Publishing, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Pasztor A. (2004) Radical constructivism has been viable: On math education and more. Karl Jasper Forum TA73 C41. http://www.kjf.ca/
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Watzlawick P. (1984) Components of ideological “realities.” In: Watzlawick P. (ed.) The invented Reality. W. W. Norton & Company, New York: 206–248.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.
