Understanding. The Mutual Regulation of Cognition and Culture
Gebhard Rusch
Log in to download the full text for free
> Citation
> Similar
> References
> Add Comment
Abstract
Purpose: Demonstrate that cognitive and social approaches towards understanding do not at all oppose but rather they complement each other. Constructivist concepts of understanding paved the way to conceive of understanding as a cognitive-social “mechanism” which mutually regulates processes of social structuration and, at the same time, cognitive constructions and processing. Findings: Constructivist approaches bridge the gap between the cognitive and the social faces of understanding. They demonstrate how comprehension and cultivation, cognition and cultural reproduction are mutually linked to each other by the cognitive-social “mechanism” of understanding. As a consequence, the unavoidable immunisation against communicative demands from others jeopardizes the achievements of our communicative culture. Practical implications: Communicators are even more responsible for success or failure of communication than recipients. Moreover, as educators they are responsible for both cultural reproduction and the reinforcement of creativity and innovation. This double bind can only be managed with strong and resistant personal relations. All construction of meaning and all interpretation should be conceived of as a pro-construction, a hypothetical provisional reading made for the tough going of public or scholarly discourse. Original value: Concept of understanding integrating philosophical, psychological and sociological approaches within a constructivist theory of communication and reception.
Key words: understanding, communication, reception, cognition, structuration, hermeneutics
Citation
Rusch G. (2007) Understanding. The mutual regulation of cognition and culture. Constructivist Foundations 2(2-3): 118–128. http://constructivist.info/2/2-3/118
Export article citation data:
Plain Text ·
BibTex ·
EndNote ·
Reference Manager (RIS)
Similar articles
References
Abel T. (1948/1949) The operation called Verstehen. The American Journal of Sociology LIV: 211–218.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Apel K. O. (1973) Transformation der Philosophie. 2.Bde. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Austin J. L. (1962) How to do things with words. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Betti E. (1962) Die Hermeneutik als allgemeine Methodik der Geisteswissenschaften. Mohr, Tübingen.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Brinker W. (2004) Janus. God of beginnings. Retrieved from http://www.meridiangraphics.net/janus.htm on 12 September 2006.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Chladenius J. M. (1741) Dissertatio de sententiis et libris sententiosis. Leipzig.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dannhauer J. C. (1630) Idea bonis interpretis et Malitiosi Calumniatoris Quae Oscuritate Dispulsa, Verum Sensum a falso deicernere in omnibus auctorum scriptis ac orationibus docet, & plene respondet ad quaestionem Unde scis hunc esse sensum, non alium? Strassburg.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Davidson D. (1984) Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Clarendon Press, Oxford
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Davidson D. (1986) A nice derangement of epitaphs. In: Lepore E. (ed.) Truth and interpretation. Perpsectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson. Clarendon Press, Oxford: 433–446.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dilthey W. (1966) Das hermeneutische System Schleiermachers in der Auseinandersetzung mit der älteren protestantischen Hermeneutik. In: Dilthey W., Gesammelte Schriften 14(2) Leben Schleiermachers. Schleiermachers System als Philosophie und Theologie. Teubner, Stuttgart: 595–787.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Dilthey W. (1981) Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gadamer H.-G. (1986) Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Mohr, Tübingen.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Gergen K. J. (1988) If persons are texts. In: Messer S. B., Sass L. A. & Woolfolk R. L. (eds.) Hermeneutics and psychological theory. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick & London: 28–51.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Giddens A. (1984) The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press, Cambridge.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Glasersfeld E. von(1995) Radical constructivism. A way of knowing and learning. Routledge/Falmer, London, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Hörmann H. (1978) Meinen und Verstehen. Grundzüge einer psychologischen Semantik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Jung R. (1995) Communication and control in time. Journal of Communication and Cognition 28: 275–308
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lewis D. (1975) Konventionen. Eine sprachphilosophische Abhandlung. De Gruyter, Berlin, New York.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Lindsay P. H. & Norman D. D. (1973) Human information processing. Academic Press, New York, London.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Ricoeur P. (1986) Du texte á l’action. Essais d’herméneutique II. Seuil, Paris.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rusch G. (1986) Verstehen verstehen. In: Luhmann N. & Schorr K. E. (eds.) Zwischen Intransparenz und Verstehen. Fragen an die Pädagogik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/ M.: 40–71.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rusch G. (1987) Erkenntnis, Wissenschaft, Geschichte. Von einem konstruktivistischen Standpunkt. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rusch G. (1990) Verstehen verstehen. Kognitive Autonomie und soziale Regulation. In: Deutsches Institut für Fernstudien an der Universität Tübingen (ed.) Funkkolleg Medien und Kommunikation. Studienbrief 4, Studieneinheit 8, Tübingen: 11–44.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rusch G. (1992) Auffassen, Begreifen und Verstehen. Neue Überlegungen zu einer konstruktivistischen Theorie des Verstehens. In: Schmidt S. J. (ed.), Kognition und Gesellschaft. Frankfurt, Suhrkamp: 214–256.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rusch G. (2000) Verstehen: Zum Verhältnis von Konstruktivismus und Hermeneutik. In: Fischer H. R. & Schmidt S. J. (eds.) Wirklichkeit und Welterzeugung. In memoriam Nelson Goodman. Carl Auer, Heidelberg: 350–363
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Rusch G. (2003) Die Entkopplung von Kommunikation und Rezeption. Verständigungsverhältnisse in der Mediengesell-schaft. In: Richter H. & Schmitz H. W. (eds.) Kommunikation – ein Schlüsselbegriff in den Humanwissenschaften. Nodus: Münster: 149–165.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Schleiermacher F. (1977) Hermeneutik und Kritik (edited by M. Frank). Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Wittgenstein L. (1963) Philosophical investigations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
▸︎ Google︎ Scholar
Comments: 0
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.