Log in to download the full text for free
Open peer commentary on the target article “Arguments Opposing the Radicalism of Radical Constructivism” by Gernot Saalmann. First paragraph: Gernot Saalmann applauds radical constructivism’s (§35) use of human constructs “to understand the foreign,” but bemoans its refusal to accept any additional claim that these may “correspond with reality” (§§33, 34). The author seems to forget, unfortunately, that the refusal was meant to solve a problem – that of the absence of an observed referent in social research. His plea for a replacement by “critical realism” does not deal with that problem, and thus falls flat.
de Zeeuw G. (2007) Forgotten distinctions in the critique of radical constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 3(1): 15–16. http://constructivist.info/3/1/015
To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.