Volume 3 · Number 1 · Pages 21–26
Systemic versus Genetic Determination

Humberto R. Maturana

Download the full text in
PDF (101 kB)

> Citation > Similar > References > 1 Comment

Abstract

Purpose: Reflecting on the propensity of our culture to think in local linear causality such as “genetic determination” by examining (living) systems and their operation. Findings: The existence of a system is operational, and a system exists as such only as long as the operational conditions that constitute it prevail. As the observer distinguishes a system, he or she specifies with his or her operation of distinction the conditions that constitute the system. Since the adaptation between living systems and medium is invariant, all that happens in their history must happen as a flow of structural congruent changes conserving their organization and adaptation. Therefore, the ontogenic phenotype is not genetically determined but arises in the process of epigenesis i.e., along a path of interactions starting from the initial structure of both system and medium, along the conservation of its living. Implications: Natural selection should not be considered as a directing pressure causing the differential survival of living systems but as its result.

Key words: causality, structural determinism, systems, existence, adaptation, epigenesis, Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck, natural selection

Citation

Maturana H. R. (2007) Systemic versus genetic determination. Constructivist Foundations 3(1): 21–26. http://constructivist.info/3/1/021

Export article citation data: Plain Text · BibTex · EndNote · Reference Manager (RIS)

Similar articles

Maturana H. R., Paucar-Caceres A. & Harnden R. (2011) Origins and Implications of Autopoiesis. Preface to the Second Edition of De Máquinas y Seres Vivos
Cadenas H. & Arnold M. (2015) The Autopoiesis of Social Systems and its Criticisms
Hejl P. M. (2011) The Individual in Radical Constructivism. Some Critical Remarks from an Evolutionary Perspective
Scholl A. (2012) Author’s Response: What Constructivism Does not Say
Scholl A. (2012) Between Realism and Constructivism? Luhmann’s Ambivalent Epistemological Standpoint

Comments: 1

To stay informed about comments to this publication and post comments yourself, please log in first.

Comment by Santos Halper · 20 Mar 2019
Sadly, this paper is not available. It seems a simple mistake may be behind this. Likely just a matter of correctly matching the appropriate URL. I would love to read this paper by Maturana if this could be remedied. Thank you very much.